Standard

Сегменты и границы. / Клейнер, Юрий Александрович.

Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.. М., 2018. стр. 184–193.

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференцийстатья в сборникенаучнаяРецензирование

Harvard

Клейнер, ЮА 2018, Сегменты и границы. в Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.. М., стр. 184–193.

APA

Клейнер, Ю. А. (2018). Сегменты и границы. в Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика. (стр. 184–193).

Vancouver

Клейнер ЮА. Сегменты и границы. в Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.. М. 2018. стр. 184–193

Author

Клейнер, Юрий Александрович. / Сегменты и границы. Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.. М., 2018. стр. 184–193

BibTeX

@inbook{9145adbf3b7746418b6ee3ed43457be4,
title = "Сегменты и границы",
abstract = "Two types of boundaries, between morphemes and within their exponents, corresponding to two kinds of segmentation, in combination, reveal typologically different units of the plane of expression (Gordina{\textquoteright}s Rule) and, hence, types of languages, viz. (1) Phonemic Languages. Vowel and consonant phonemes revealed as a result of the non-coincidence of morpheme- and syllable boundaries, yielded due to the presence of zero-inflexion forms in the paradigm and resyllabation respectively, cf. /to-ka/ - morphologically, tok-{\O} - tok-а .{\textquoteright}current (nom. and gen.){\textquoteright}. (2) Isolating Languages (erroneously, syllabic ). The boundaries of the morpheme exponent coinciding with those of the minimal unit of the plane of expression, alias paradigmatic inventory unit, not opposed as {\textquoteleft}consonant{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}vowel{\textquoteright} phonemes to form /C/ + /V/ combinations, or phonemic syllables ({\textquoteleft}constructional units{\textquoteright}). (3) Intermediate Type (erroneously, phonemic languages ). Partly admitted type (1) resyllabation yielding phonemes (e.g. Engl. /i:/ and /d/ in read - read-ing - rea-ding ) vs. froms with no resyllabation ( living ) and no morpheme boundaries ( pity ), plus suppletion forms of the sit-sat type (erroneously, {\textquoteleft}inner inflexion forms{\textquoteright}). The use, jointly, of the two kinds of boundaries relies on the principle of the dual segmentation, which implies, in turn, the connection of the units of the plane of expression with meaning.",
author = "Клейнер, {Юрий Александрович}",
year = "2018",
language = "русский",
pages = "184–193",
booktitle = "Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Сегменты и границы

AU - Клейнер, Юрий Александрович

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Two types of boundaries, between morphemes and within their exponents, corresponding to two kinds of segmentation, in combination, reveal typologically different units of the plane of expression (Gordina’s Rule) and, hence, types of languages, viz. (1) Phonemic Languages. Vowel and consonant phonemes revealed as a result of the non-coincidence of morpheme- and syllable boundaries, yielded due to the presence of zero-inflexion forms in the paradigm and resyllabation respectively, cf. /to-ka/ - morphologically, tok-Ø - tok-а .’current (nom. and gen.)’. (2) Isolating Languages (erroneously, syllabic ). The boundaries of the morpheme exponent coinciding with those of the minimal unit of the plane of expression, alias paradigmatic inventory unit, not opposed as ‘consonant’ and ‘vowel’ phonemes to form /C/ + /V/ combinations, or phonemic syllables (‘constructional units’). (3) Intermediate Type (erroneously, phonemic languages ). Partly admitted type (1) resyllabation yielding phonemes (e.g. Engl. /i:/ and /d/ in read - read-ing - rea-ding ) vs. froms with no resyllabation ( living ) and no morpheme boundaries ( pity ), plus suppletion forms of the sit-sat type (erroneously, ‘inner inflexion forms’). The use, jointly, of the two kinds of boundaries relies on the principle of the dual segmentation, which implies, in turn, the connection of the units of the plane of expression with meaning.

AB - Two types of boundaries, between morphemes and within their exponents, corresponding to two kinds of segmentation, in combination, reveal typologically different units of the plane of expression (Gordina’s Rule) and, hence, types of languages, viz. (1) Phonemic Languages. Vowel and consonant phonemes revealed as a result of the non-coincidence of morpheme- and syllable boundaries, yielded due to the presence of zero-inflexion forms in the paradigm and resyllabation respectively, cf. /to-ka/ - morphologically, tok-Ø - tok-а .’current (nom. and gen.)’. (2) Isolating Languages (erroneously, syllabic ). The boundaries of the morpheme exponent coinciding with those of the minimal unit of the plane of expression, alias paradigmatic inventory unit, not opposed as ‘consonant’ and ‘vowel’ phonemes to form /C/ + /V/ combinations, or phonemic syllables (‘constructional units’). (3) Intermediate Type (erroneously, phonemic languages ). Partly admitted type (1) resyllabation yielding phonemes (e.g. Engl. /i:/ and /d/ in read - read-ing - rea-ding ) vs. froms with no resyllabation ( living ) and no morpheme boundaries ( pity ), plus suppletion forms of the sit-sat type (erroneously, ‘inner inflexion forms’). The use, jointly, of the two kinds of boundaries relies on the principle of the dual segmentation, which implies, in turn, the connection of the units of the plane of expression with meaning.

UR - https://www.ruslang.ru/book/trudy-instituta-russkogo-yazyka-im-v-v-vinogradova-vypusk-17-fonetika

UR - https://nestorbook.ru/trudy-instituta-russkogo-yazyka-im-v-v-vinogradova-vyp-17-fonetika

UR - https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39179770

M3 - статья в сборнике

SP - 184

EP - 193

BT - Труды Института русского языка им. В. В. Виноградова. Выпуск 17. Фонетика.

CY - М.

ER -

ID: 51054607