Standard

Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere? / Manuilova, Rada O.; Yankovsky, Valentine A.

1 p. Geophysical Research Abstracts ed. European Geosciences Union. 2016.

Research output: Other contribution › Research

Harvard

Manuilova, RO & Yankovsky, VA 2016, Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere?. European Geosciences Union. <http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/EGU2016-9362-2.pdf>

APA

Manuilova, R. O., & Yankovsky, V. A. (2016). Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere? (Geophysical Research Abstracts ed.) European Geosciences Union. http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2016/EGU2016-9362-2.pdf

Vancouver

Manuilova RO, Yankovsky VA. Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere? 2016. 1 p.

Author

Manuilova, Rada O. ; Yankovsky, Valentine A. / Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere?. 2016. European Geosciences Union. 1 p.

BibTeX

@misc{2f8e4c3d089a40fdbd8651535f99fa9f,
title = "Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere?",
author = "Manuilova, {Rada O.} and Yankovsky, {Valentine A.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
address = "Germany",
edition = "Geophysical Research Abstracts",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Why the oxygen IR emission at 1.27 µm is not the best way for ozone retrieval in the mesosphere?

AU - Manuilova, Rada O.

AU - Yankovsky, Valentine A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

M3 - Other contribution

VL - 18

PB - European Geosciences Union

ER -

ID: 7624770