Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Vozmozhnosti komp'iuternoi tomografii i komp'iuterno-tomograficheskoi angiografii v otsenke mestnoi rasprostranennosti tsentral'nogo raka legkogo. / Cheremisin, V. M.; Turanov, N. L.; Tiurin, I. E.
In: Vestnik Rentgenologii i Radiologii, No. 6, 1997, p. 4-11.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Vozmozhnosti komp'iuternoi tomografii i komp'iuterno-tomograficheskoi angiografii v otsenke mestnoi rasprostranennosti tsentral'nogo raka legkogo.
AU - Cheremisin, V. M.
AU - Turanov, N. L.
AU - Tiurin, I. E.
N1 - Copyright: This record is sourced from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - To define the potentialities of conventional computed tomography (CCT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the the evaluation of spread of central-type lung cancer, 141 patients were studied. The results of the studies were compared with the data of surgical interventions in 86 patients. The analysis of their efficiency was based on the examination of the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each technique. Analyzing the findings showed that the potentialities of CECT exceeded those of CCT. There were the most manifest differences in the accuracy and sensitivity of these techniques. This was due to the fact that CECT was the leading imaging of vessels, such as the pulmonary artery, superior cava, aorta, which in turn greatly reduced the number of false-negative and false-positive conclusions. No great differences were found in the efficiency of the techniques when the invasion of the trachea, esophagus, and vertebral column was determined.
AB - To define the potentialities of conventional computed tomography (CCT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the the evaluation of spread of central-type lung cancer, 141 patients were studied. The results of the studies were compared with the data of surgical interventions in 86 patients. The analysis of their efficiency was based on the examination of the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each technique. Analyzing the findings showed that the potentialities of CECT exceeded those of CCT. There were the most manifest differences in the accuracy and sensitivity of these techniques. This was due to the fact that CECT was the leading imaging of vessels, such as the pulmonary artery, superior cava, aorta, which in turn greatly reduced the number of false-negative and false-positive conclusions. No great differences were found in the efficiency of the techniques when the invasion of the trachea, esophagus, and vertebral column was determined.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031262439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - статья
C2 - 9503993
AN - SCOPUS:0031262439
SP - 4
EP - 11
JO - ВЕСТНИК РЕНТГЕНОЛОГИИ И РАДИОЛОГИИ
JF - ВЕСТНИК РЕНТГЕНОЛОГИИ И РАДИОЛОГИИ
SN - 0042-4676
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 75564238