Standard

Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea. / Чава, Александра Ивановна; Артемьева, Анна Васильевна; Яковис, Евгений Леонидович.

In: Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 744, 05.09.2024, p. 53-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Чава, АИ, Артемьева, АВ & Яковис, ЕЛ 2024, 'Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea', Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 744, pp. 53-67. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14664

APA

Чава, А. И., Артемьева, А. В., & Яковис, Е. Л. (2024). Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 744, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14664

Vancouver

Чава АИ, Артемьева АВ, Яковис ЕЛ. Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2024 Sep 5;744:53-67. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14664

Author

Чава, Александра Ивановна ; Артемьева, Анна Васильевна ; Яковис, Евгений Леонидович. / Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea. In: Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2024 ; Vol. 744. pp. 53-67.

BibTeX

@article{4210ee26226e46f1bd47a401343566ed,
title = "Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea",
abstract = "Epibiosis is shaped by a complex interplay of biotic interactions involving hosts, epibionts, and mobile consumers. In temperate waters, consumer control by mesograzers prevents complete overgrowth of seaweeds. In polar waters, the mechanisms determining the abundances of sessile organisms associated with seaweeds are unknown. We empirically assessed the strength of the consumer control effect on the colonization of the sub-arctic red seaweed Phycodrys rubens by caging individual plants in the field in the shallow subtidal of the White Sea (65°N). We compared epibiosis on plants in consumer exclosure cages, in cages with the mesopredatory shrimp Spirontocaris phippsii, in semi-enclosed cages, and on unmanipulated plants in a cold year (2014) and a warm year (2015). Despite the dramatic interannual variation in consumer control, the mean total cover of epibionts in the absence of consumers never exceeded 15%. While consumers had a substantial effect on the total epibiont cover in the warm year and a nearly negligible effect in the cold year, the total cover of unmanipulated algae was similar in 2014 and 2015. Bryozoans, which were selectively impacted by consumers—particularly shrimp—dominated in both years. However, bryozoan abundance was much lower in 2015, when the abundance of hydroids, sponges, and bivalves—less affected by consumers—increased. Consumer control is not a key factor preventing most Phycodrys plants from being heavily overgrown. Yet, smaller plants, which have a higher epibiont cover, may indirectly benefit from consumers. Future climate changes are likely to make the Phycodrys epibiosis increasingly top-down regulated.",
keywords = "Epibiosis, Interannual variation, Mesopredator, Predation, Red algae, Shrimp, Top-down control, White Sea",
author = "Чава, {Александра Ивановна} and Артемьева, {Анна Васильевна} and Яковис, {Евгений Леонидович}",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "5",
doi = "10.3354/meps14664",
language = "English",
volume = "744",
pages = "53--67",
journal = "Marine Ecology - Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in top-down control of red algae epibiosis in the White Sea

AU - Чава, Александра Ивановна

AU - Артемьева, Анна Васильевна

AU - Яковис, Евгений Леонидович

PY - 2024/9/5

Y1 - 2024/9/5

N2 - Epibiosis is shaped by a complex interplay of biotic interactions involving hosts, epibionts, and mobile consumers. In temperate waters, consumer control by mesograzers prevents complete overgrowth of seaweeds. In polar waters, the mechanisms determining the abundances of sessile organisms associated with seaweeds are unknown. We empirically assessed the strength of the consumer control effect on the colonization of the sub-arctic red seaweed Phycodrys rubens by caging individual plants in the field in the shallow subtidal of the White Sea (65°N). We compared epibiosis on plants in consumer exclosure cages, in cages with the mesopredatory shrimp Spirontocaris phippsii, in semi-enclosed cages, and on unmanipulated plants in a cold year (2014) and a warm year (2015). Despite the dramatic interannual variation in consumer control, the mean total cover of epibionts in the absence of consumers never exceeded 15%. While consumers had a substantial effect on the total epibiont cover in the warm year and a nearly negligible effect in the cold year, the total cover of unmanipulated algae was similar in 2014 and 2015. Bryozoans, which were selectively impacted by consumers—particularly shrimp—dominated in both years. However, bryozoan abundance was much lower in 2015, when the abundance of hydroids, sponges, and bivalves—less affected by consumers—increased. Consumer control is not a key factor preventing most Phycodrys plants from being heavily overgrown. Yet, smaller plants, which have a higher epibiont cover, may indirectly benefit from consumers. Future climate changes are likely to make the Phycodrys epibiosis increasingly top-down regulated.

AB - Epibiosis is shaped by a complex interplay of biotic interactions involving hosts, epibionts, and mobile consumers. In temperate waters, consumer control by mesograzers prevents complete overgrowth of seaweeds. In polar waters, the mechanisms determining the abundances of sessile organisms associated with seaweeds are unknown. We empirically assessed the strength of the consumer control effect on the colonization of the sub-arctic red seaweed Phycodrys rubens by caging individual plants in the field in the shallow subtidal of the White Sea (65°N). We compared epibiosis on plants in consumer exclosure cages, in cages with the mesopredatory shrimp Spirontocaris phippsii, in semi-enclosed cages, and on unmanipulated plants in a cold year (2014) and a warm year (2015). Despite the dramatic interannual variation in consumer control, the mean total cover of epibionts in the absence of consumers never exceeded 15%. While consumers had a substantial effect on the total epibiont cover in the warm year and a nearly negligible effect in the cold year, the total cover of unmanipulated algae was similar in 2014 and 2015. Bryozoans, which were selectively impacted by consumers—particularly shrimp—dominated in both years. However, bryozoan abundance was much lower in 2015, when the abundance of hydroids, sponges, and bivalves—less affected by consumers—increased. Consumer control is not a key factor preventing most Phycodrys plants from being heavily overgrown. Yet, smaller plants, which have a higher epibiont cover, may indirectly benefit from consumers. Future climate changes are likely to make the Phycodrys epibiosis increasingly top-down regulated.

KW - Epibiosis

KW - Interannual variation

KW - Mesopredator

KW - Predation

KW - Red algae

KW - Shrimp

KW - Top-down control

KW - White Sea

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/e9f7aaca-cf8b-3ad4-aa62-315d04071c46/

U2 - 10.3354/meps14664

DO - 10.3354/meps14664

M3 - Article

VL - 744

SP - 53

EP - 67

JO - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology - Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -

ID: 127718545