Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Two Methods for Defining Jacobi Coordinates in the Planetary Problem. / Микрюков, Денис Викторович.
In: Vestnik St. Petersburg University: Mathematics, Vol. 59, No. 1, 01.03.2026, p. 115-124.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Two Methods for Defining Jacobi Coordinates in the Planetary Problem
AU - Микрюков, Денис Викторович
PY - 2026/3/1
Y1 - 2026/3/1
N2 - Abstract: Two methods for defining Jacobi coordinates in the planetary problem are considered and compared. The first method is classical, the second is proposed for the first time. The methods differ in the specification of an auxiliary vector required for nondegeneracy of the transformation of the initial absolute coordinates (this vector is usually supplied with a zero index). In the classical version, this vector specifies the absolute position of the barycenter of the system, whereas in the one proposed in this work, it specifies the absolute position of the central star. When considering each method, expressions for canonically conjugate momenta are derived. As a result of a detailed comparative analysis performed on the basis of the Hamiltonian formalism of mechanics, it is shown that after the reduction of the center of mass, both methods lead to the same system of equations of planetary motion. It is remarkable that the representation of potential energy, and along with it the representation of the disturbing function, turn out to be invariant in Jacobi coordinates with respect to the definitions under consideration. Formulas are given that are convenient for the practical application of perturbation theory methods.
AB - Abstract: Two methods for defining Jacobi coordinates in the planetary problem are considered and compared. The first method is classical, the second is proposed for the first time. The methods differ in the specification of an auxiliary vector required for nondegeneracy of the transformation of the initial absolute coordinates (this vector is usually supplied with a zero index). In the classical version, this vector specifies the absolute position of the barycenter of the system, whereas in the one proposed in this work, it specifies the absolute position of the central star. When considering each method, expressions for canonically conjugate momenta are derived. As a result of a detailed comparative analysis performed on the basis of the Hamiltonian formalism of mechanics, it is shown that after the reduction of the center of mass, both methods lead to the same system of equations of planetary motion. It is remarkable that the representation of potential energy, and along with it the representation of the disturbing function, turn out to be invariant in Jacobi coordinates with respect to the definitions under consideration. Formulas are given that are convenient for the practical application of perturbation theory methods.
KW - Hamiltonian
KW - Jacobi coordinates
KW - heliocentric coordinates
KW - long-term dynamics of planetary systems
KW - osculating elements
KW - perturbation function
KW - planetary N-body problem
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6f3163dd-ec55-3b7b-8dce-e1d406b1369e/
U2 - 10.1134/S1063454125700840
DO - 10.1134/S1063454125700840
M3 - Article
VL - 59
SP - 115
EP - 124
JO - Vestnik St. Petersburg University: Mathematics
JF - Vestnik St. Petersburg University: Mathematics
SN - 1063-4541
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 149335378