The unspecified residual category of the DSM-5

Standard

The unspecified residual category of the DSM-5 : the challenges of a catch-all diagnosis. / Kovalenko, Julia D.; Kulesz, Paulina A.; Hein, Sascha; Quintana, Diana; Shelton, Matthew; Grigorenko, Elena L.

In: Current Psychology, 17.07.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Author

Kovalenko, Julia D. ; Kulesz, Paulina A. ; Hein, Sascha ; Quintana, Diana ; Shelton, Matthew ; Grigorenko, Elena L. / The unspecified residual category of the DSM-5 : the challenges of a catch-all diagnosis. In: Current Psychology. 2021.

BibTeX

@article{66b1fbe4409747dfa58ca9de0ac854dd,

title = "The unspecified residual category of the DSM-5: the challenges of a catch-all diagnosis",

abstract = "The past over-usage of the DSM-IV category of “not otherwise specified” (NOS) resulted in it becoming a vague, catch-all label. The new nomenclature in the DSM-5 is Unspecified Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorder (UDICCD), however, there are little to no data available on the new nomenclature. The current article is aimed at examining the practical usage of the UDICCD diagnosis by mental health practitioners in the juvenile justice system (JJS). Among the findings, three were most notable. First, girls were more likely than boys to receive a specified diagnosis over UDICCD, in particular ODD. Second, two latent classes were identified within this sample based on various behavior and demographic risk correlates of disruptive behavior disorders. Third, animal cruelty, familial support, and alcohol/drug use predicted whether a youth would receive a UDICCD diagnosis. Results and implications are discussed.",

keywords = "Delinquency, Gender differences, Juvenile justice, Latent class analysis, Mental health, CALLOUS-UNEMOTIONAL TRAITS, PAST 10 YEARS, SUBSTANCE USE, CONDUCT DISORDER, OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT, RISK, DELINQUENCY, JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM, PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS, GENDER-DIFFERENCES",

author = "Kovalenko, {Julia D.} and Kulesz, {Paulina A.} and Sascha Hein and Diana Quintana and Matthew Shelton and Grigorenko, {Elena L.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

day = "17",

doi = "10.1007/s12144-021-02077-9",

language = "English",

journal = "Current Psychology",

issn = "1046-1310",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unspecified residual category of the DSM-5

T2 - the challenges of a catch-all diagnosis

AU - Kovalenko, Julia D.

AU - Kulesz, Paulina A.

AU - Hein, Sascha

AU - Quintana, Diana

AU - Shelton, Matthew

AU - Grigorenko, Elena L.

PY - 2021/7/17

Y1 - 2021/7/17

N2 - The past over-usage of the DSM-IV category of “not otherwise specified” (NOS) resulted in it becoming a vague, catch-all label. The new nomenclature in the DSM-5 is Unspecified Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorder (UDICCD), however, there are little to no data available on the new nomenclature. The current article is aimed at examining the practical usage of the UDICCD diagnosis by mental health practitioners in the juvenile justice system (JJS). Among the findings, three were most notable. First, girls were more likely than boys to receive a specified diagnosis over UDICCD, in particular ODD. Second, two latent classes were identified within this sample based on various behavior and demographic risk correlates of disruptive behavior disorders. Third, animal cruelty, familial support, and alcohol/drug use predicted whether a youth would receive a UDICCD diagnosis. Results and implications are discussed.

AB - The past over-usage of the DSM-IV category of “not otherwise specified” (NOS) resulted in it becoming a vague, catch-all label. The new nomenclature in the DSM-5 is Unspecified Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorder (UDICCD), however, there are little to no data available on the new nomenclature. The current article is aimed at examining the practical usage of the UDICCD diagnosis by mental health practitioners in the juvenile justice system (JJS). Among the findings, three were most notable. First, girls were more likely than boys to receive a specified diagnosis over UDICCD, in particular ODD. Second, two latent classes were identified within this sample based on various behavior and demographic risk correlates of disruptive behavior disorders. Third, animal cruelty, familial support, and alcohol/drug use predicted whether a youth would receive a UDICCD diagnosis. Results and implications are discussed.

KW - Delinquency

KW - Gender differences

KW - Juvenile justice

KW - Latent class analysis

KW - Mental health

KW - CALLOUS-UNEMOTIONAL TRAITS

KW - PAST 10 YEARS

KW - SUBSTANCE USE

KW - CONDUCT DISORDER

KW - OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT

KW - RISK

KW - DELINQUENCY

KW - JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

KW - PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS

KW - GENDER-DIFFERENCES

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110627079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6e009ad9-3c53-32f8-bc90-1ebc3bc089bf/

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-021-02077-9

DO - 10.1007/s12144-021-02077-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85110627079

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

ER -

ID: 86662617