Standard

The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis. / Gudalov, Nikolay N. ; Treshchenkov, Evgeny Yu. .

In: Croatian International Relations Review, Vol. 26, No. 86, 2020, p. 6-41.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Gudalov, NN & Treshchenkov, EY 2020, 'The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis', Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 26, no. 86, pp. 6-41.

APA

Gudalov, N. N., & Treshchenkov, E. Y. (2020). The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis. Croatian International Relations Review, 26(86), 6-41.

Vancouver

Gudalov NN, Treshchenkov EY. The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis. Croatian International Relations Review. 2020;26(86):6-41.

Author

Gudalov, Nikolay N. ; Treshchenkov, Evgeny Yu. . / The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis. In: Croatian International Relations Review. 2020 ; Vol. 26, No. 86. pp. 6-41.

BibTeX

@article{97ce3fcbaef44259955bb40b6c9f6ef1,
title = "The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "Resilience is a widespread concept and a key priority for the EU. We focus on resilience{\textquoteright}s relations with stability. These notions have been subject to ongoing theoretical debate and have not been clearly separated in EU discourses. We explore how resilience and stability have been used regarding the Southern and Eastern dimensions of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and suggest how their different meanings may be better distinguished and conceptualised. Resilience has penetrated the ENP{\textquoteright}s discourses unevenly and attracted the limited interest of the neighbours. Besides, the EU{\textquoteright}s policies will likely face numerous practical problems mostly similar to the ENP{\textquoteright}s both dimensions. The EU{\textquoteright}s policies themselves have disturbed stability in its neighbourhood, and now, even restoring the old stability would be problematic, let alone attaining a more positive one. Furthermore, the EU could impose its views regarding stability and/or resilience. Also, Brussels could de facto uphold negative stability and/or resilience.",
keywords = "resilience, STABILITY, European Union, European neighbourhood policy",
author = "Gudalov, {Nikolay N.} and Treshchenkov, {Evgeny Yu.}",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "6--41",
journal = "Croatian International Relations Review",
issn = "1331-1182",
publisher = "Institute for International Relations",
number = "86",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Resilience of the EU Neighbours to the South and to the East: A Comparative Analysis

AU - Gudalov, Nikolay N.

AU - Treshchenkov, Evgeny Yu.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Resilience is a widespread concept and a key priority for the EU. We focus on resilience’s relations with stability. These notions have been subject to ongoing theoretical debate and have not been clearly separated in EU discourses. We explore how resilience and stability have been used regarding the Southern and Eastern dimensions of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and suggest how their different meanings may be better distinguished and conceptualised. Resilience has penetrated the ENP’s discourses unevenly and attracted the limited interest of the neighbours. Besides, the EU’s policies will likely face numerous practical problems mostly similar to the ENP’s both dimensions. The EU’s policies themselves have disturbed stability in its neighbourhood, and now, even restoring the old stability would be problematic, let alone attaining a more positive one. Furthermore, the EU could impose its views regarding stability and/or resilience. Also, Brussels could de facto uphold negative stability and/or resilience.

AB - Resilience is a widespread concept and a key priority for the EU. We focus on resilience’s relations with stability. These notions have been subject to ongoing theoretical debate and have not been clearly separated in EU discourses. We explore how resilience and stability have been used regarding the Southern and Eastern dimensions of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and suggest how their different meanings may be better distinguished and conceptualised. Resilience has penetrated the ENP’s discourses unevenly and attracted the limited interest of the neighbours. Besides, the EU’s policies will likely face numerous practical problems mostly similar to the ENP’s both dimensions. The EU’s policies themselves have disturbed stability in its neighbourhood, and now, even restoring the old stability would be problematic, let alone attaining a more positive one. Furthermore, the EU could impose its views regarding stability and/or resilience. Also, Brussels could de facto uphold negative stability and/or resilience.

KW - resilience

KW - STABILITY

KW - European Union

KW - European neighbourhood policy

UR - https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=345061&lang=en

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 6

EP - 41

JO - Croatian International Relations Review

JF - Croatian International Relations Review

SN - 1331-1182

IS - 86

ER -

ID: 53049142