Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones. / Троицкий, Сергей Александрович.
In: Rivista di Estetica, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.04.2018, p. 165-180.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones
AU - Троицкий, Сергей Александрович
N1 - Funding Information: 1 his paper is the revised and enlarged special edition of the article which was published in Russian in New Literary Observer, 133, 3: 66-75. Special thanks to our English-language editor, Chris Gilbert. Also special thanks to Alexander Chertenko for his advice and attention. he translator Maria Semykolennykh supplemented the paper with linguistic commentary. he reported study was funded by Rfbr according to the research project n. 16-03-00442 at St. Petersburg State University.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.
AB - Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049670048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4000/estetica.2772
DO - 10.4000/estetica.2772
M3 - Review article
VL - 67
SP - 165
EP - 180
JO - Rivista di Estetica
JF - Rivista di Estetica
SN - 0035-6212
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 36874162