Standard

The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones. / Троицкий, Сергей Александрович.

In: Rivista di Estetica, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.04.2018, p. 165-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{38de5ea1552b4426bf97f3324c5a113b,
title = "The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones",
abstract = "Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.",
author = "Троицкий, {Сергей Александрович}",
note = "Funding Information: 1 his paper is the revised and enlarged special edition of the article which was published in Russian in New Literary Observer, 133, 3: 66-75. Special thanks to our English-language editor, Chris Gilbert. Also special thanks to Alexander Chertenko for his advice and attention. he translator Maria Semykolennykh supplemented the paper with linguistic commentary. he reported study was funded by Rfbr according to the research project n. 16-03-00442 at St. Petersburg State University.",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4000/estetica.2772",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "165--180",
journal = "Rivista di Estetica",
issn = "0035-6212",
publisher = "ROSENBERG & SELLIER",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Problem of Terminological Precision in Studies on Cultural Exclusion Zones

AU - Троицкий, Сергей Александрович

N1 - Funding Information: 1 his paper is the revised and enlarged special edition of the article which was published in Russian in New Literary Observer, 133, 3: 66-75. Special thanks to our English-language editor, Chris Gilbert. Also special thanks to Alexander Chertenko for his advice and attention. he translator Maria Semykolennykh supplemented the paper with linguistic commentary. he reported study was funded by Rfbr according to the research project n. 16-03-00442 at St. Petersburg State University.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.

AB - Studying cultural memory and practices of “oblivion” and “remembrance”, scholars encounter a whole range of phenomena which have remained nameless and practically undescribed in special literature so far and, therefore, are, in a manner of speaking, “illegitimate”. Moreover, to use well-established terminology inevitably means to employ traditional approaches, which due to their retrospective character aren't able to recognize new phenomena. hus, we should describe such phenomena and “bring them to light” by means of speciic terminology. he paper introduces these fundamental terms, allowing for the description of previously unapparent cultural phenomena. he list of these terms includes “cultural exclusion zones”, “current (ield) of culture”, “deactualization,” “reactualization”, and “cultural frontier (borderline) zones”.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049670048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4000/estetica.2772

DO - 10.4000/estetica.2772

M3 - Review article

VL - 67

SP - 165

EP - 180

JO - Rivista di Estetica

JF - Rivista di Estetica

SN - 0035-6212

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 36874162