Standard

The national idea in Russia and Europe. / Markov, B. V.

In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 40-49.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Harvard

Markov, BV 2017, 'The national idea in Russia and Europe', Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 40-49. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105

APA

Markov, B. V. (2017). The national idea in Russia and Europe. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, 33(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105

Vancouver

Markov BV. The national idea in Russia and Europe. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia. 2017 Jan 1;33(1):40-49. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105

Author

Markov, B. V. / The national idea in Russia and Europe. In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 40-49.

BibTeX

@article{11458e5fbc7e42d9b3feea4aa820a5d0,
title = "The national idea in Russia and Europe",
abstract = "The article offers comparative analysis of philosophical research into the national principle in Russia and Europe. The views of M. Mamardaschvilli, N. Berdiaev, V. Solovyov, M. Scheler and O. Spengler are compared. We also identify similarities and differences between their definitions of national consciousness. The means of harmonizing various concepts are defined, each of which is suitable for explaining some forms of national consciousness in specific historical circumstances. Metaphors of unity and integrity no longer give exhaustive descriptions of modernity. The complicated relationship of different cultures and peoples is impossible to describe through a universal theory. We must deal with each individual case using various conceptual systems and identifying common prerequisites and assumptions. Today the responsibility of intellectuals is to restore national identity without causing a “genius of war.” Without questioning the need for compliance with the formal requirements of tolerance, it is proposed to restore the theoretical and ethical principle of neighbourhood and hospitality, ensuring the peaceful existence of the people doomed to live its neighbors. Refs 13.",
keywords = "Ethnic group, Man, Nation, National character, National idea, Nationalism, Society, State",
author = "Markov, {B. V.}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "40--49",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The national idea in Russia and Europe

AU - Markov, B. V.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The article offers comparative analysis of philosophical research into the national principle in Russia and Europe. The views of M. Mamardaschvilli, N. Berdiaev, V. Solovyov, M. Scheler and O. Spengler are compared. We also identify similarities and differences between their definitions of national consciousness. The means of harmonizing various concepts are defined, each of which is suitable for explaining some forms of national consciousness in specific historical circumstances. Metaphors of unity and integrity no longer give exhaustive descriptions of modernity. The complicated relationship of different cultures and peoples is impossible to describe through a universal theory. We must deal with each individual case using various conceptual systems and identifying common prerequisites and assumptions. Today the responsibility of intellectuals is to restore national identity without causing a “genius of war.” Without questioning the need for compliance with the formal requirements of tolerance, it is proposed to restore the theoretical and ethical principle of neighbourhood and hospitality, ensuring the peaceful existence of the people doomed to live its neighbors. Refs 13.

AB - The article offers comparative analysis of philosophical research into the national principle in Russia and Europe. The views of M. Mamardaschvilli, N. Berdiaev, V. Solovyov, M. Scheler and O. Spengler are compared. We also identify similarities and differences between their definitions of national consciousness. The means of harmonizing various concepts are defined, each of which is suitable for explaining some forms of national consciousness in specific historical circumstances. Metaphors of unity and integrity no longer give exhaustive descriptions of modernity. The complicated relationship of different cultures and peoples is impossible to describe through a universal theory. We must deal with each individual case using various conceptual systems and identifying common prerequisites and assumptions. Today the responsibility of intellectuals is to restore national identity without causing a “genius of war.” Without questioning the need for compliance with the formal requirements of tolerance, it is proposed to restore the theoretical and ethical principle of neighbourhood and hospitality, ensuring the peaceful existence of the people doomed to live its neighbors. Refs 13.

KW - Ethnic group

KW - Man

KW - Nation

KW - National character

KW - National idea

KW - Nationalism

KW - Society

KW - State

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052877031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.105

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85052877031

VL - 33

SP - 40

EP - 49

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 40881211