Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in an anthology › Research › peer-review
The implementation of performance management in Russia (the case of the Ministry of Economic Development). / Menshikova, Galina ; Evstratchik, Svetlana .
Proceedings of the Third International Economic Symposium (IES 2018). ed. / Victor Titov. Atlantis Press, 2019. p. 231-222 (Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research; Vol. 104).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in an anthology › Research › peer-review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - The implementation of performance management in Russia (the case of the Ministry of Economic Development)
AU - Menshikova, Galina
AU - Evstratchik, Svetlana
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The article describes the technology of performance management as a special type of management, which is based on comparison between the achieved and planned indicators. The authors prove the necessity to implement this method into the practice of government agencies and their officials’ activities managing. In Russia, this method is used in stuff management, i.e. at enterprises, but not in government. There is no practice of public obligations of agencies’ heads for their annual work. The term “performance management” is not used in Russian science, it is replaced by "management by results," which has absolutely other meaning. It seems that the Russian state leaders see a low level of quality management in the country. There were calls for improved planning and separate measures have been proposed at least in the presidential decrees. The authors of the article reveal some improvements, but consider them absolutely inadequate. For the argumentation of this conclusion, the accounts of the Ministry of Economic Development - the profile structure in the Government responsible for carrying out economic and administrative reforms - considered. The result of our calculations: the report does not comply with the principles of the PM, of the planned indicators the report contained only 11%.
AB - The article describes the technology of performance management as a special type of management, which is based on comparison between the achieved and planned indicators. The authors prove the necessity to implement this method into the practice of government agencies and their officials’ activities managing. In Russia, this method is used in stuff management, i.e. at enterprises, but not in government. There is no practice of public obligations of agencies’ heads for their annual work. The term “performance management” is not used in Russian science, it is replaced by "management by results," which has absolutely other meaning. It seems that the Russian state leaders see a low level of quality management in the country. There were calls for improved planning and separate measures have been proposed at least in the presidential decrees. The authors of the article reveal some improvements, but consider them absolutely inadequate. For the argumentation of this conclusion, the accounts of the Ministry of Economic Development - the profile structure in the Government responsible for carrying out economic and administrative reforms - considered. The result of our calculations: the report does not comply with the principles of the PM, of the planned indicators the report contained only 11%.
KW - performance management
KW - the comparison between planned and reporting indicators
UR - https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ies-18/125924766
M3 - Article in an anthology
SN - 9789462528475
T3 - Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
SP - 231
EP - 222
BT - Proceedings of the Third International Economic Symposium (IES 2018)
A2 - Titov, Victor
PB - Atlantis Press
T2 - Third International Economic Symposium - 2018 (IES 2018)
Y2 - 19 April 2018 through 21 April 2018
ER -
ID: 49873406