Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
The Gardner Problem on the Lock-In Range of Second-Order Type 2 Phase-Locked Loops. / Kuznetsov, Nikolay V.; Lobachev, Mikhail Y.; Yuldashev, Marat V.; Yuldashev, Renat V.; Tavazoei, Mohammad S.
In: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 68, No. 12, 12, 01.12.2023, p. 7436-7450.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Gardner Problem on the Lock-In Range of Second-Order Type 2 Phase-Locked Loops
AU - Kuznetsov, Nikolay V.
AU - Lobachev, Mikhail Y.
AU - Yuldashev, Marat V.
AU - Yuldashev, Renat V.
AU - Tavazoei, Mohammad S.
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Phase-locked loops (PLLs) are nonlinear automatic control circuits widely used in telecommunications, computer architecture, gyroscopes, and other applications. One of the key problems of nonlinear analysis of PLL systems has been stated by Floyd M. Gardner as being “to define exactly any unique lock-in frequency.” The lock-in range concept describes the ability of PLLs to reacquire a locked state without cycle slipping and its calculation requires nonlinear analysis. The present work analyzes a second-order type 2 phase-locked loop with a sinusoidal phase detector characteristic. Using the qualitative theory of dynamical systems and classical methods of control theory, we provide stability analysis and suggest analytical lower and upper estimates of the lock-in range based on the exact lock-in range formula for a second-order type 2 PLL with a triangular phase detector characteristic, obtained earlier. Applying phase plane analysis, an asymptotic formula for the lock-in range which refines the existing formula is obtained. The analytical formulas are compared with computer simulation and engineering estimates of the lock-in range. The comparison shows that engineering estimates can lead to cycle slipping in the corresponding PLL model and cannot provide a reliable solution for the Gardner problem, whereas the lower estimate presented in this article guarantees frequency reacquisition without cycle slipping for all parameters, which provides a solution to the Gardner problem.
AB - Phase-locked loops (PLLs) are nonlinear automatic control circuits widely used in telecommunications, computer architecture, gyroscopes, and other applications. One of the key problems of nonlinear analysis of PLL systems has been stated by Floyd M. Gardner as being “to define exactly any unique lock-in frequency.” The lock-in range concept describes the ability of PLLs to reacquire a locked state without cycle slipping and its calculation requires nonlinear analysis. The present work analyzes a second-order type 2 phase-locked loop with a sinusoidal phase detector characteristic. Using the qualitative theory of dynamical systems and classical methods of control theory, we provide stability analysis and suggest analytical lower and upper estimates of the lock-in range based on the exact lock-in range formula for a second-order type 2 PLL with a triangular phase detector characteristic, obtained earlier. Applying phase plane analysis, an asymptotic formula for the lock-in range which refines the existing formula is obtained. The analytical formulas are compared with computer simulation and engineering estimates of the lock-in range. The comparison shows that engineering estimates can lead to cycle slipping in the corresponding PLL model and cannot provide a reliable solution for the Gardner problem, whereas the lower estimate presented in this article guarantees frequency reacquisition without cycle slipping for all parameters, which provides a solution to the Gardner problem.
KW - Aerospace electronics
KW - Cycle slipping
KW - Detectors
KW - Frequency control
KW - Mathematical models
KW - PLL
KW - Phase locked loops
KW - Stability analysis
KW - Voltage-controlled oscillators
KW - gardner problem
KW - lock-in range
KW - lyapunov methods
KW - nonlinear control systems
KW - phase-locked loops
KW - stability analysis
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/316a3169-a46f-3430-8891-e9819f6ddb3b/
U2 - 10.1109/tac.2023.3277896
DO - 10.1109/tac.2023.3277896
M3 - Article
VL - 68
SP - 7436
EP - 7450
JO - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
JF - IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
SN - 0018-9286
IS - 12
M1 - 12
ER -
ID: 106816291