Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{58eff80640074d4f9c1e3c01eee8afab,
title = "The Features of Club`s Strict Liability for Using of Fireworks by Spectators Based on the Example of CAS Decisions: CAS 2013/A/3139, CAS 2013/A/3324 & 3369, CAS 2014/A/3944",
abstract = "In the article, the authors refer to the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in cases of bringing clubs to disciplinary responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. Such disputes in the disciplinary practice of UEFA and CAS have features related both to the way the fan commits an offense and to the assessment of the seriousness of the act and respect for the principle of proportionality of the sanction. Resort to the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport helps to get answers to these and some other questions of clubs responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. With the actual status of CAS in the field of sports law, it means bringing legal certainty to the regulation of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.",
keywords = "the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations, strict liability of clubs, the disciplinary responsibility of clubs, fans behavior, use of pyrotechnics by fans, Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), decisions of CAS, the proportionality of disciplinary sanctions",
author = "Ilya Vasilyev and Margarita Izmalkova and Raisa Khalatova",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "5",
language = "English",
pages = "135--142",
journal = "Russian Journal of Comparative Law",
issn = "2413-7618",
publisher = "Academic Publishing House Researcher",
number = "5 (2)",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Features of Club`s Strict Liability for Using of Fireworks by Spectators Based on the Example of CAS Decisions: CAS 2013/A/3139, CAS 2013/A/3324 & 3369, CAS 2014/A/3944

AU - Vasilyev, Ilya

AU - Izmalkova, Margarita

AU - Khalatova, Raisa

PY - 2019/2/5

Y1 - 2019/2/5

N2 - In the article, the authors refer to the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in cases of bringing clubs to disciplinary responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. Such disputes in the disciplinary practice of UEFA and CAS have features related both to the way the fan commits an offense and to the assessment of the seriousness of the act and respect for the principle of proportionality of the sanction. Resort to the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport helps to get answers to these and some other questions of clubs responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. With the actual status of CAS in the field of sports law, it means bringing legal certainty to the regulation of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.

AB - In the article, the authors refer to the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in cases of bringing clubs to disciplinary responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. Such disputes in the disciplinary practice of UEFA and CAS have features related both to the way the fan commits an offense and to the assessment of the seriousness of the act and respect for the principle of proportionality of the sanction. Resort to the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport helps to get answers to these and some other questions of clubs responsibility for the use of pyrotechnics by fans. With the actual status of CAS in the field of sports law, it means bringing legal certainty to the regulation of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.

KW - the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations

KW - strict liability of clubs

KW - the disciplinary responsibility of clubs

KW - fans behavior

KW - use of pyrotechnics by fans

KW - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)

KW - decisions of CAS

KW - the proportionality of disciplinary sanctions

UR - https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37011600

M3 - Article

SP - 135

EP - 142

JO - Russian Journal of Comparative Law

JF - Russian Journal of Comparative Law

SN - 2413-7618

IS - 5 (2)

ER -

ID: 38178243