Standard

The education of juveniles in detention : Policy considerations and infrastructure development. / Geib, Catherine Foley; Chapman, John F.; D'Amaddio, Amy H.; Grigorenko, Elena L.

In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 21, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Geib, CF, Chapman, JF, D'Amaddio, AH & Grigorenko, EL 2011, 'The education of juveniles in detention: Policy considerations and infrastructure development', Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

APA

Geib, C. F., Chapman, J. F., D'Amaddio, A. H., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). The education of juveniles in detention: Policy considerations and infrastructure development. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

Vancouver

Geib CF, Chapman JF, D'Amaddio AH, Grigorenko EL. The education of juveniles in detention: Policy considerations and infrastructure development. Learning and Individual Differences. 2011 Feb;21(1):3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

Author

Geib, Catherine Foley ; Chapman, John F. ; D'Amaddio, Amy H. ; Grigorenko, Elena L. / The education of juveniles in detention : Policy considerations and infrastructure development. In: Learning and Individual Differences. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 3-11.

BibTeX

@article{5ef21b0fca7746b897bee5836c943168,
title = "The education of juveniles in detention: Policy considerations and infrastructure development",
abstract = "This article presents a discussion of the state of affairs pertaining to educating juvenile justice-involved youth. It summarizes general observations regarding the schooling of juveniles in pre-trial and post-trial incarceration settings, as well as, juveniles on probation or in community settings. The article selectively presents relevant regulations on educating juveniles and various local realizations of these regulations, and comments on the dearth of relevant empirical studies on the population of court-involved youth, their special educational needs, and best practices that are effective with this population. The article ends by telling one state's story, through a policy analysis framework, about the impetus for action, the identification of challenges, and the strategies initiated to develop an infrastructure to meet the needs.",
keywords = "Corrections, Delinquency, Detention, Education, Juvenile",
author = "Geib, {Catherine Foley} and Chapman, {John F.} and D'Amaddio, {Amy H.} and Grigorenko, {Elena L.}",
note = "Funding Information: Preparation of this article was supported, in part, by a contract from the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division to the Yale Child Study Center and by Grant No. P50 HD052120 , as administered by the U.S. National Institutes of Health . Grantees undertaking such projects are encouraged to express freely their professional judgment. This article, therefore, does not necessarily represent the position of the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division or the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The authors express gratitude to Jerry P. Nims, PhD, JD for his comments on the manuscript and to Ms. Mei Tan for her editorial assistance.",
year = "2011",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The education of juveniles in detention

T2 - Policy considerations and infrastructure development

AU - Geib, Catherine Foley

AU - Chapman, John F.

AU - D'Amaddio, Amy H.

AU - Grigorenko, Elena L.

N1 - Funding Information: Preparation of this article was supported, in part, by a contract from the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division to the Yale Child Study Center and by Grant No. P50 HD052120 , as administered by the U.S. National Institutes of Health . Grantees undertaking such projects are encouraged to express freely their professional judgment. This article, therefore, does not necessarily represent the position of the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division or the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The authors express gratitude to Jerry P. Nims, PhD, JD for his comments on the manuscript and to Ms. Mei Tan for her editorial assistance.

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - This article presents a discussion of the state of affairs pertaining to educating juvenile justice-involved youth. It summarizes general observations regarding the schooling of juveniles in pre-trial and post-trial incarceration settings, as well as, juveniles on probation or in community settings. The article selectively presents relevant regulations on educating juveniles and various local realizations of these regulations, and comments on the dearth of relevant empirical studies on the population of court-involved youth, their special educational needs, and best practices that are effective with this population. The article ends by telling one state's story, through a policy analysis framework, about the impetus for action, the identification of challenges, and the strategies initiated to develop an infrastructure to meet the needs.

AB - This article presents a discussion of the state of affairs pertaining to educating juvenile justice-involved youth. It summarizes general observations regarding the schooling of juveniles in pre-trial and post-trial incarceration settings, as well as, juveniles on probation or in community settings. The article selectively presents relevant regulations on educating juveniles and various local realizations of these regulations, and comments on the dearth of relevant empirical studies on the population of court-involved youth, their special educational needs, and best practices that are effective with this population. The article ends by telling one state's story, through a policy analysis framework, about the impetus for action, the identification of challenges, and the strategies initiated to develop an infrastructure to meet the needs.

KW - Corrections

KW - Delinquency

KW - Detention

KW - Education

KW - Juvenile

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650510072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78650510072

VL - 21

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 87395588