Standard

The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I. / Bystrov, V. Yu; Kamnev, V. M.

In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2018, p. 333-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bystrov, V. Yu ; Kamnev, V. M. / The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I. In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia. 2018 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 333-347.

BibTeX

@article{59f2ea5ee4f8446f8303a860c98623bb,
title = "The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I",
abstract = "New historical and philosophical approach to a solution to the problem of continuity in the development of the Russian philosophy is presented in the article. The phenomenon of the Russian philosophy is exposed as a dispozitiv — as a peculiar combination of the diverse elements connected with each other only in the external way. The Russian pre-revolutionary philosophy, the Soviet philosophy, and Post-Soviet philosophy represent only qualitatively peculiar forms of the same phenomenon or stages of its development. The historian of philosophy who considers the Russian philosophy as a dispozitiv needs to disclose, first, internal heterogeneity of the Russian philosophy, i.e. to present it as a dispozitiv, and secondly, to define basic elements, components this dispozitiv and to track in what measure they remain at these three stages. We allocate three such elements, proceeding from the fact that concerning the first element there is the standard recognition that it is an element which is called “the Russian idea”. The second element is characterized by the specific relation to metaphysics. The third element of that dispozitiv represents an understanding of the situation of choice between knowledge and belief, science and religion. Further, these elements of the dispozitiv of the Russian philosophy will be given more detailed characteristic. The historian of philosophy in his work quite often cannot get rid of the hypnotic impact of the natural process of transformation of values that characterizes the studied phenomenon and remains at the level of the description. This approach allows historian of philosophy to overcome superficial and unilateral approaches and to see internal constancy of the phenomenon of the Russian philosophy that remains invariable.",
keywords = "Dispozitiv, Historian of philosophy, Method, Reason, Russian philosophy",
author = "Bystrov, {V. Yu} and Kamnev, {V. M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.302",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "333--347",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I

AU - Bystrov, V. Yu

AU - Kamnev, V. M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - New historical and philosophical approach to a solution to the problem of continuity in the development of the Russian philosophy is presented in the article. The phenomenon of the Russian philosophy is exposed as a dispozitiv — as a peculiar combination of the diverse elements connected with each other only in the external way. The Russian pre-revolutionary philosophy, the Soviet philosophy, and Post-Soviet philosophy represent only qualitatively peculiar forms of the same phenomenon or stages of its development. The historian of philosophy who considers the Russian philosophy as a dispozitiv needs to disclose, first, internal heterogeneity of the Russian philosophy, i.e. to present it as a dispozitiv, and secondly, to define basic elements, components this dispozitiv and to track in what measure they remain at these three stages. We allocate three such elements, proceeding from the fact that concerning the first element there is the standard recognition that it is an element which is called “the Russian idea”. The second element is characterized by the specific relation to metaphysics. The third element of that dispozitiv represents an understanding of the situation of choice between knowledge and belief, science and religion. Further, these elements of the dispozitiv of the Russian philosophy will be given more detailed characteristic. The historian of philosophy in his work quite often cannot get rid of the hypnotic impact of the natural process of transformation of values that characterizes the studied phenomenon and remains at the level of the description. This approach allows historian of philosophy to overcome superficial and unilateral approaches and to see internal constancy of the phenomenon of the Russian philosophy that remains invariable.

AB - New historical and philosophical approach to a solution to the problem of continuity in the development of the Russian philosophy is presented in the article. The phenomenon of the Russian philosophy is exposed as a dispozitiv — as a peculiar combination of the diverse elements connected with each other only in the external way. The Russian pre-revolutionary philosophy, the Soviet philosophy, and Post-Soviet philosophy represent only qualitatively peculiar forms of the same phenomenon or stages of its development. The historian of philosophy who considers the Russian philosophy as a dispozitiv needs to disclose, first, internal heterogeneity of the Russian philosophy, i.e. to present it as a dispozitiv, and secondly, to define basic elements, components this dispozitiv and to track in what measure they remain at these three stages. We allocate three such elements, proceeding from the fact that concerning the first element there is the standard recognition that it is an element which is called “the Russian idea”. The second element is characterized by the specific relation to metaphysics. The third element of that dispozitiv represents an understanding of the situation of choice between knowledge and belief, science and religion. Further, these elements of the dispozitiv of the Russian philosophy will be given more detailed characteristic. The historian of philosophy in his work quite often cannot get rid of the hypnotic impact of the natural process of transformation of values that characterizes the studied phenomenon and remains at the level of the description. This approach allows historian of philosophy to overcome superficial and unilateral approaches and to see internal constancy of the phenomenon of the Russian philosophy that remains invariable.

KW - Dispozitiv

KW - Historian of philosophy

KW - Method

KW - Reason

KW - Russian philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056594443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.302

DO - 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056594443

VL - 34

SP - 333

EP - 347

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 76193962