Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football. / Vasilyev, Ilya ; Izmalkova, Margarita ; Khalatova, Raisa ; Alexandrova, Anastasia ; Vetrova, Evgeniya .
In: Russian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 6, No. 2 , 2019, p. 94-101.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport Positions on Fault or Negligence of Anti-Doping Regulation Violations in Football
AU - Vasilyev, Ilya
AU - Izmalkova, Margarita
AU - Khalatova, Raisa
AU - Alexandrova, Anastasia
AU - Vetrova, Evgeniya
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Scientific researches on the legal regulations of the fight against doping are carried out mainly in the Western doctrine within the framework of International law, Sports law, human rights, and European Union law. In post-Soviet legal science there is an intensive growth in the number of sports research, mainly sectoral (administrative, constitutional, labor, criminal law). However, there is practically no research on FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations. There is a difference between the two forms of anti-doping rule violation: the first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample, the second form is the use of a prohibited substance by an athlete. In this study, we will analyze the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (hereinafter – CAS, arbitration) in cases of anti-doping regulation violations on issues of fault or negligence in football and draw conclusions, what facts can be accepted by the arbitration.
AB - Scientific researches on the legal regulations of the fight against doping are carried out mainly in the Western doctrine within the framework of International law, Sports law, human rights, and European Union law. In post-Soviet legal science there is an intensive growth in the number of sports research, mainly sectoral (administrative, constitutional, labor, criminal law). However, there is practically no research on FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations. There is a difference between the two forms of anti-doping rule violation: the first form is the presence of a prohibited substance in an athlete’s sample, the second form is the use of a prohibited substance by an athlete. In this study, we will analyze the practice of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (hereinafter – CAS, arbitration) in cases of anti-doping regulation violations on issues of fault or negligence in football and draw conclusions, what facts can be accepted by the arbitration.
KW - fault or negligence in anti-doping cases
KW - significant fault or negligence antidoping cases
KW - football anti-doping regulations
KW - FIFA Anti-Doping Regulations
KW - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
KW - practice of CAS
UR - http://ejournal41.com/en/archive.html?number=2019-12-01-15:00:09&journal=16
M3 - Article
VL - 6
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Russian Journal of Comparative Law
JF - Russian Journal of Comparative Law
SN - 2413-7618
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 52513407