Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
The application of the ARCH model for the assessment of transport routes in Northern Europe and Southeast Asia. / Киккас, Ксения; Черенков, Виталий Иванович; Березовская, Ирина; Аносова, Надежда.
4th International Scientific Conference “Arctic: History and Modernity”. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. ed. 2019. 012100.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - The application of the ARCH model for the assessment of transport routes in Northern Europe and Southeast Asia
AU - Киккас, Ксения
AU - Черенков, Виталий Иванович
AU - Березовская, Ирина
AU - Аносова, Надежда
N1 - Kikkas, K. N. The application of the ARCH model for the assessment of transport routes in Northern Europe and Southeast Asia K. N. Kikkas, V. I. Cherenkov, I. P. Berezovskaya, N. E. Anosova // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 302, 4th International Scientific Conference "Arctic: History and Modernity" 17–18 April 2019. - Russian Federation : Saint Petersburg, 2019. - URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012100/pdf, free. - Title from screen.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The article proposes the method of comparison of future transport routes to connect North Europe and Southeast Asia. Two transport routes can pass through the expanses of the Arctic Ocean, along the shores of Russia and Canada. The Southern Sea Route on the Suez Canal and the Trans-Siberian Railway are the alternative transport routes. The Northern Sea Route is the shortest waterway between Northern Europe and Southeast Asia and has many advantages of goods transportation in the future. Compared to the Northwest Route along the Canadian coast, the Northern Sea Route has a greater number of competitive advantages. The authors outline the stages of transport routes comparison method. At the first stage, the goal of the analysis is set and the mathematical model is chosen. The second stage determines the resulting and influential indicators. The third stage involves collecting the information on selected indicators with each indicator being a time series. At the fourth stage, time invariance of each time series is analyzed. At the fifth stage, model is selected that displays the transport corridor. The sixth and seventh stages deal with autocorrelation and multicollinear analysis. At the eighth stage the coefficients of the equations are calculated. At the ninth stage, the conditional variance of the series of the resulting indicator is estimated and the decision is made whether to use the model of autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (Arch – Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroscedasticit) for prediction. The paper describes the results of comparison of various international transport routes.
AB - The article proposes the method of comparison of future transport routes to connect North Europe and Southeast Asia. Two transport routes can pass through the expanses of the Arctic Ocean, along the shores of Russia and Canada. The Southern Sea Route on the Suez Canal and the Trans-Siberian Railway are the alternative transport routes. The Northern Sea Route is the shortest waterway between Northern Europe and Southeast Asia and has many advantages of goods transportation in the future. Compared to the Northwest Route along the Canadian coast, the Northern Sea Route has a greater number of competitive advantages. The authors outline the stages of transport routes comparison method. At the first stage, the goal of the analysis is set and the mathematical model is chosen. The second stage determines the resulting and influential indicators. The third stage involves collecting the information on selected indicators with each indicator being a time series. At the fourth stage, time invariance of each time series is analyzed. At the fifth stage, model is selected that displays the transport corridor. The sixth and seventh stages deal with autocorrelation and multicollinear analysis. At the eighth stage the coefficients of the equations are calculated. At the ninth stage, the conditional variance of the series of the resulting indicator is estimated and the decision is made whether to use the model of autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (Arch – Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroscedasticit) for prediction. The paper describes the results of comparison of various international transport routes.
KW - РОССИЙСКИЙ ИНДЕКС НАУЧНОГО ЦИТИРОВАНИЯ
KW - SCOPUS
KW - ARCH model
KW - transport routes
KW - Northern Europe
KW - Southeast Asia
KW - SCOPUS
KW - РОССИЙСКИЙ ИНДЕКС НАУЧНОГО ЦИТИРОВАНИЯ
U2 - doi:10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012100
DO - doi:10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012100
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - 4th International Scientific Conference “Arctic: History and Modernity”
ER -
ID: 54259355