Standard

Study of Ozone Layer Variability near St. Petersburg on the Basis of SBUV Satellite Measurements and Numerical Simulation (2000-2014). / Virolainen, Y. A.; Timofeyev, Y. M.; Smyshlyaev, S. P.; Motsakov, M. A.; Kirner, O.

In: IZVESTIYA. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS, Vol. 53, No. 9, 12.2017, p. 911-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Virolainen, Y. A. ; Timofeyev, Y. M. ; Smyshlyaev, S. P. ; Motsakov, M. A. ; Kirner, O. / Study of Ozone Layer Variability near St. Petersburg on the Basis of SBUV Satellite Measurements and Numerical Simulation (2000-2014). In: IZVESTIYA. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS. 2017 ; Vol. 53, No. 9. pp. 911-917.

BibTeX

@article{b68d61db1e464e4da6a0f165d62fb320,
title = "Study of Ozone Layer Variability near St. Petersburg on the Basis of SBUV Satellite Measurements and Numerical Simulation (2000-2014)",
abstract = "A comparison between the numerical simulation results of ozone fields with different experimental data makes it possible to estimate the quality of models for their further use in reliable forecasts of ozone layer evolution. We analyze time series of satellite (SBUV) measurements of the total ozone column (TOC) and the ozone partial columns in two atmospheric layers (0-25 and 25-60 km) and compare them with the results of numerical simulation in the chemistry transport model (CTM) for the low and middle atmosphere and the chemistry climate model EMAC. The daily and monthly average ozone values, short-term periods of ozone depletion, and long-term trends of ozone columns are considered; all data sets relate to St. Petersburg and the period between 2000 and 2014. The statistical parameters (means, standard deviations, variations, medians, asymmetry parameter, etc.) of the ozone time series are quite similar for all datasets. However, the EMAC model systematically underestimates the ozone columns in all layers considered. The corresponding differences between satellite measurements and EMAC numerical simulations are (5 +/- 5)% and (7 +/- 7)% and (1 +/- 4)% for the ozone column in the 0-25 and 25-60 km layers, respectively. The correspondent differences between SBUV measurements and CTM results amount to (0 +/- 7)%, (1 +/- 9)%, and (-2 +/- 8)%. Both models describe the sudden episodes of the ozone minimum well, but the EMAC accuracy is much higher than that of the CTM, which often underestimates the ozone minima. Assessments of the long-term linear trends show that they are close to zero for all datasets for the period under study.",
keywords = "atmospheric ozone, numerical simulation, satellite measurements, CLIMATE MODEL, CHEMISTRY, VALIDATION, SURFACE, IMPACT, SET",
author = "Virolainen, {Y. A.} and Timofeyev, {Y. M.} and Smyshlyaev, {S. P.} and Motsakov, {M. A.} and O. Kirner",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1134/S0001433817090328",
language = "Английский",
volume = "53",
pages = "911--917",
journal = "Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics",
issn = "0001-4338",
publisher = "МАИК {"}Наука/Интерпериодика{"}",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study of Ozone Layer Variability near St. Petersburg on the Basis of SBUV Satellite Measurements and Numerical Simulation (2000-2014)

AU - Virolainen, Y. A.

AU - Timofeyev, Y. M.

AU - Smyshlyaev, S. P.

AU - Motsakov, M. A.

AU - Kirner, O.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - A comparison between the numerical simulation results of ozone fields with different experimental data makes it possible to estimate the quality of models for their further use in reliable forecasts of ozone layer evolution. We analyze time series of satellite (SBUV) measurements of the total ozone column (TOC) and the ozone partial columns in two atmospheric layers (0-25 and 25-60 km) and compare them with the results of numerical simulation in the chemistry transport model (CTM) for the low and middle atmosphere and the chemistry climate model EMAC. The daily and monthly average ozone values, short-term periods of ozone depletion, and long-term trends of ozone columns are considered; all data sets relate to St. Petersburg and the period between 2000 and 2014. The statistical parameters (means, standard deviations, variations, medians, asymmetry parameter, etc.) of the ozone time series are quite similar for all datasets. However, the EMAC model systematically underestimates the ozone columns in all layers considered. The corresponding differences between satellite measurements and EMAC numerical simulations are (5 +/- 5)% and (7 +/- 7)% and (1 +/- 4)% for the ozone column in the 0-25 and 25-60 km layers, respectively. The correspondent differences between SBUV measurements and CTM results amount to (0 +/- 7)%, (1 +/- 9)%, and (-2 +/- 8)%. Both models describe the sudden episodes of the ozone minimum well, but the EMAC accuracy is much higher than that of the CTM, which often underestimates the ozone minima. Assessments of the long-term linear trends show that they are close to zero for all datasets for the period under study.

AB - A comparison between the numerical simulation results of ozone fields with different experimental data makes it possible to estimate the quality of models for their further use in reliable forecasts of ozone layer evolution. We analyze time series of satellite (SBUV) measurements of the total ozone column (TOC) and the ozone partial columns in two atmospheric layers (0-25 and 25-60 km) and compare them with the results of numerical simulation in the chemistry transport model (CTM) for the low and middle atmosphere and the chemistry climate model EMAC. The daily and monthly average ozone values, short-term periods of ozone depletion, and long-term trends of ozone columns are considered; all data sets relate to St. Petersburg and the period between 2000 and 2014. The statistical parameters (means, standard deviations, variations, medians, asymmetry parameter, etc.) of the ozone time series are quite similar for all datasets. However, the EMAC model systematically underestimates the ozone columns in all layers considered. The corresponding differences between satellite measurements and EMAC numerical simulations are (5 +/- 5)% and (7 +/- 7)% and (1 +/- 4)% for the ozone column in the 0-25 and 25-60 km layers, respectively. The correspondent differences between SBUV measurements and CTM results amount to (0 +/- 7)%, (1 +/- 9)%, and (-2 +/- 8)%. Both models describe the sudden episodes of the ozone minimum well, but the EMAC accuracy is much higher than that of the CTM, which often underestimates the ozone minima. Assessments of the long-term linear trends show that they are close to zero for all datasets for the period under study.

KW - atmospheric ozone

KW - numerical simulation

KW - satellite measurements

KW - CLIMATE MODEL

KW - CHEMISTRY

KW - VALIDATION

KW - SURFACE

KW - IMPACT

KW - SET

U2 - 10.1134/S0001433817090328

DO - 10.1134/S0001433817090328

M3 - статья

VL - 53

SP - 911

EP - 917

JO - Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

JF - Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

SN - 0001-4338

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 9819868