Standard

State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals : Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging. / Бахин, Сергей Владимирович.

In: ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА, Vol. 90, No. 4/2015, 2015, p. 18-30.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Бахин, СВ 2015, 'State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging', ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА, vol. 90, no. 4/2015, pp. 18-30.

APA

Бахин, С. В. (2015). State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging. ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА, 90(4/2015), 18-30.

Vancouver

Бахин СВ. State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging. ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА. 2015;90(4/2015):18-30.

Author

Бахин, Сергей Владимирович. / State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals : Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging. In: ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 4/2015. pp. 18-30.

BibTeX

@article{f277cfeb1dc641b09d9da90d8bbd9fa1,
title = "State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging",
abstract = "Annotation: This Article provides an analysis of Russian legislation, as well as its interpretation in the decisions of the RF Constitutional Court and the RF Higher Arbitration Court, of the res judicata effect of awards of international commercial arbitration tribunals. The UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958 and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights have been proffered as grounds for adducing the res judicata effect to arbitral awards. This Article provides a research of the Principles of International Civil Procedure and the Resolution of the Association of International Law № 1/2006 “International Commercial Arbitration” regarding the res judicata effect of arbitral awards. It is argued that the matter of res judicata effect of arbitral awards requires international regulation.",
keywords = "Kew words: Claim preclusion, issue preclusion, lis pendens, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue estoppel, estoppel in pais, arbitration, court, Russian legislation, the RF Constitutional Court, the RF Higher Arbitration Court, the UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958, protection of human rights, the European Court of Human Rights, the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT), the American Law Institute (ALI), the ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure, the Association of International Law (AIL).",
author = "Бахин, {Сергей Владимирович}",
note = "Bakhin S.V. State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging // Journal of international private law. 2015. N 4(90). P. 18-30. ",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "18--30",
journal = "ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА",
issn = "0869-737X",
publisher = "СКФ Россия-Нева",
number = "4/2015",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals

T2 - Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging

AU - Бахин, Сергей Владимирович

N1 - Bakhin S.V. State Courts and International Commercial Arbitration Tribunals: Regulation of Res Judicata, Current and Emerging // Journal of international private law. 2015. N 4(90). P. 18-30.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Annotation: This Article provides an analysis of Russian legislation, as well as its interpretation in the decisions of the RF Constitutional Court and the RF Higher Arbitration Court, of the res judicata effect of awards of international commercial arbitration tribunals. The UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958 and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights have been proffered as grounds for adducing the res judicata effect to arbitral awards. This Article provides a research of the Principles of International Civil Procedure and the Resolution of the Association of International Law № 1/2006 “International Commercial Arbitration” regarding the res judicata effect of arbitral awards. It is argued that the matter of res judicata effect of arbitral awards requires international regulation.

AB - Annotation: This Article provides an analysis of Russian legislation, as well as its interpretation in the decisions of the RF Constitutional Court and the RF Higher Arbitration Court, of the res judicata effect of awards of international commercial arbitration tribunals. The UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958 and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights have been proffered as grounds for adducing the res judicata effect to arbitral awards. This Article provides a research of the Principles of International Civil Procedure and the Resolution of the Association of International Law № 1/2006 “International Commercial Arbitration” regarding the res judicata effect of arbitral awards. It is argued that the matter of res judicata effect of arbitral awards requires international regulation.

KW - Kew words: Claim preclusion, issue preclusion, lis pendens, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue estoppel, estoppel in pais, arbitration, court, Russian legislation, the RF Constitutional Court, the RF Higher Arbitration Court, the UN Convention on th

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 18

EP - 30

JO - ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА

JF - ЖУРНАЛ МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ЧАСТНОГО ПРАВА

SN - 0869-737X

IS - 4/2015

ER -

ID: 74672176