Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Speech communication in terms of cognition. / Pesina, Svetlana A.; Kiseleva, Svetlana V.; Rudakova, Svetlana V.; Vinogradova, Svetlana A.; Trofimova, Nella A.; Novikov, Dmitry N. .
In: Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío, Vol. 34, No. S3, 08.09.2022, p. 82-89.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Speech communication in terms of cognition
AU - Pesina, Svetlana A.
AU - Kiseleva, Svetlana V.
AU - Rudakova, Svetlana V.
AU - Vinogradova, Svetlana A.
AU - Trofimova, Nella A.
AU - Novikov, Dmitry N.
N1 - Pesina, S. A., Kiseleva, S. V., Rudakova, S. V., Vinogradova, S. A., & Trofimova, N. A. (2022). Speech communication in terms of cognition . Revista De Investigaciones Universidad Del Quindío, 34(S3), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34nS3.1000
PY - 2022/9/8
Y1 - 2022/9/8
N2 - The paper presents various approaches to defining the essence of a sign in cognitive science and philosophy of language. It offers presentations of critical review of research publications on sign processes. Based on extensive theoretical work in a cognitive approach to communication process, the hypothesis that each speaker of a language acts exclusively within the framework of their cognitive area is supported in the article. Given the results, meaning as a fact of consciousness is closed in it and during the “translation” of meanings they are not transmitted: signs cannot be considered to be carriers of meanings in the sense that meanings making up a part of their material body are contained in them. The material components of signs stimulate the appearance of identical or similar meanings, actuating analogous conceptual spheres in communicating minds.
AB - The paper presents various approaches to defining the essence of a sign in cognitive science and philosophy of language. It offers presentations of critical review of research publications on sign processes. Based on extensive theoretical work in a cognitive approach to communication process, the hypothesis that each speaker of a language acts exclusively within the framework of their cognitive area is supported in the article. Given the results, meaning as a fact of consciousness is closed in it and during the “translation” of meanings they are not transmitted: signs cannot be considered to be carriers of meanings in the sense that meanings making up a part of their material body are contained in them. The material components of signs stimulate the appearance of identical or similar meanings, actuating analogous conceptual spheres in communicating minds.
KW - language sign
KW - communication
KW - cognitive linguistcs
KW - biocognitive science
KW - meaning
KW - concept
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a11ac064-bd08-38a4-9c83-927eb020f2e6/
U2 - 10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1000
DO - 10.33975/riuq.vol34ns3.1000
M3 - Article
VL - 34
SP - 82
EP - 89
JO - Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
JF - Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío
SN - 1794-631X
IS - S3
ER -
ID: 99051619