Standard

Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem. / Hirsch, E. A.

In: Journal of Mathematical Sciences , Vol. 98, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 442-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Hirsch, EA 2000, 'Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem', Journal of Mathematical Sciences , vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 442-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02362266

APA

Vancouver

Author

Hirsch, E. A. / Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem. In: Journal of Mathematical Sciences . 2000 ; Vol. 98, No. 4. pp. 442-463.

BibTeX

@article{0acb36fdfe584531a9ac1560aa6f27b3,
title = "Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem",
abstract = "In 1980, Monien and Speckenmeyer and (independently) Dantsin proved that the satisfiability of a propositional formula in CNF can be checked in less than 2N steps (N is the number of variables). Later, many other upper bounds for SAT and its subproblems were proved. A formula in CNF is in CNF- (1, ∞) if each positive literal occurs in it at most once. In 1984, Luckhardt studied formulas in CNF-(1, ∞). In this paper, we prove several a new upper bounds for formulas in CNF-(l.∞) by introducing new signs separation principle. Namely, we present algorithms working in time of order 1.1939K and 1.0644L for a formula consisting of K clauses containing L literal occurrences. We also present an algorithm for formulas in CNF-(1, ∞) whose clauses are bounded in length.",
author = "Hirsch, {E. A.}",
year = "2000",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02362266",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "442--463",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Sciences",
issn = "1072-3374",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem

AU - Hirsch, E. A.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - In 1980, Monien and Speckenmeyer and (independently) Dantsin proved that the satisfiability of a propositional formula in CNF can be checked in less than 2N steps (N is the number of variables). Later, many other upper bounds for SAT and its subproblems were proved. A formula in CNF is in CNF- (1, ∞) if each positive literal occurs in it at most once. In 1984, Luckhardt studied formulas in CNF-(1, ∞). In this paper, we prove several a new upper bounds for formulas in CNF-(l.∞) by introducing new signs separation principle. Namely, we present algorithms working in time of order 1.1939K and 1.0644L for a formula consisting of K clauses containing L literal occurrences. We also present an algorithm for formulas in CNF-(1, ∞) whose clauses are bounded in length.

AB - In 1980, Monien and Speckenmeyer and (independently) Dantsin proved that the satisfiability of a propositional formula in CNF can be checked in less than 2N steps (N is the number of variables). Later, many other upper bounds for SAT and its subproblems were proved. A formula in CNF is in CNF- (1, ∞) if each positive literal occurs in it at most once. In 1984, Luckhardt studied formulas in CNF-(1, ∞). In this paper, we prove several a new upper bounds for formulas in CNF-(l.∞) by introducing new signs separation principle. Namely, we present algorithms working in time of order 1.1939K and 1.0644L for a formula consisting of K clauses containing L literal occurrences. We also present an algorithm for formulas in CNF-(1, ∞) whose clauses are bounded in length.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52849120789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02362266

DO - 10.1007/BF02362266

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:52849120789

VL - 98

SP - 442

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Mathematical Sciences

JF - Journal of Mathematical Sciences

SN - 1072-3374

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 49829825