Standard

Sensitivity of Visual System in 5-Day “Dry” Immersion With High-Frequency Electromyostimulation. / Shoshina, Irina; Zelenskaya, Inna; Karpinskaia, Valeriia; Shilov, Yuri; Tomilovskaya, Elena.

In: Frontiers in Neural Circuits, Vol. 15, 702792, 24.12.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Shoshina, Irina ; Zelenskaya, Inna ; Karpinskaia, Valeriia ; Shilov, Yuri ; Tomilovskaya, Elena. / Sensitivity of Visual System in 5-Day “Dry” Immersion With High-Frequency Electromyostimulation. In: Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2021 ; Vol. 15.

BibTeX

@article{78e169c0391941acbed9d284ee4f78f1,
title = "Sensitivity of Visual System in 5-Day “Dry” Immersion With High-Frequency Electromyostimulation",
abstract = "The aim of this work was to study the sensitivity of the visual system in 5-day “dry” immersion with a course of high-frequency electromyostimulation (HFEMS) and without it. “Dry” immersion (DI) is one of the most effective models of microgravity. DI reproduces three basic effects of weightlessness: physical inactivity, support withdrawal and elimination of the vertical vascular gradient. The “dry” immersion included in the use of special waterproof and highly elastic fabric on of immersion in a liquid similar in density to the tissues of the human body. The sensitivity of the visual system was assessed by measuring contrast sensitivity and magnitude of the M{\"u}ller-Lyer illusion. The visual contrast sensitivity was measured in the spatial frequency range from 0.4 to 10.0 cycles/degree. The strength of visual illusion was assessed by means of motor response using “tracking.” Measurements were carried out before the start of immersion, on the 1st, 3rd, 5th days of DI, and after its completion. Under conditions of “dry” immersion without HFEMS, upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions (BG and DI1) we observed significant differences in contrast sensitivity in the low spatial frequency range, whereas in the experiment with HFEMS—in the medium spatial frequency range. In the experiment without HFEMS, the M{\"u}ller-Lyer illusion in microgravity conditions was absent, while in the experiment using HFEMS it was significantly above zero at all stages. Thus, we obtained only limited evidence in favor of the hypothesis of a possible compensating effect of HFEMS on changes in visual sensitivity upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions and vice versa. The study is a pilot and requires further research on the effect of HFEMS on visual sensitivity.",
keywords = "contrast sensitivity, electromyostimulation, gravity, illusions, “dry” immersion",
author = "Irina Shoshina and Inna Zelenskaya and Valeriia Karpinskaia and Yuri Shilov and Elena Tomilovskaya",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Shoshina, Zelenskaya, Karpinskaia, Shilov and Tomilovskaya.",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3389/fncir.2021.702792",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Frontiers in Neural Circuits",
issn = "1662-5110",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity of Visual System in 5-Day “Dry” Immersion With High-Frequency Electromyostimulation

AU - Shoshina, Irina

AU - Zelenskaya, Inna

AU - Karpinskaia, Valeriia

AU - Shilov, Yuri

AU - Tomilovskaya, Elena

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2021 Shoshina, Zelenskaya, Karpinskaia, Shilov and Tomilovskaya.

PY - 2021/12/24

Y1 - 2021/12/24

N2 - The aim of this work was to study the sensitivity of the visual system in 5-day “dry” immersion with a course of high-frequency electromyostimulation (HFEMS) and without it. “Dry” immersion (DI) is one of the most effective models of microgravity. DI reproduces three basic effects of weightlessness: physical inactivity, support withdrawal and elimination of the vertical vascular gradient. The “dry” immersion included in the use of special waterproof and highly elastic fabric on of immersion in a liquid similar in density to the tissues of the human body. The sensitivity of the visual system was assessed by measuring contrast sensitivity and magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion. The visual contrast sensitivity was measured in the spatial frequency range from 0.4 to 10.0 cycles/degree. The strength of visual illusion was assessed by means of motor response using “tracking.” Measurements were carried out before the start of immersion, on the 1st, 3rd, 5th days of DI, and after its completion. Under conditions of “dry” immersion without HFEMS, upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions (BG and DI1) we observed significant differences in contrast sensitivity in the low spatial frequency range, whereas in the experiment with HFEMS—in the medium spatial frequency range. In the experiment without HFEMS, the Müller-Lyer illusion in microgravity conditions was absent, while in the experiment using HFEMS it was significantly above zero at all stages. Thus, we obtained only limited evidence in favor of the hypothesis of a possible compensating effect of HFEMS on changes in visual sensitivity upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions and vice versa. The study is a pilot and requires further research on the effect of HFEMS on visual sensitivity.

AB - The aim of this work was to study the sensitivity of the visual system in 5-day “dry” immersion with a course of high-frequency electromyostimulation (HFEMS) and without it. “Dry” immersion (DI) is one of the most effective models of microgravity. DI reproduces three basic effects of weightlessness: physical inactivity, support withdrawal and elimination of the vertical vascular gradient. The “dry” immersion included in the use of special waterproof and highly elastic fabric on of immersion in a liquid similar in density to the tissues of the human body. The sensitivity of the visual system was assessed by measuring contrast sensitivity and magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion. The visual contrast sensitivity was measured in the spatial frequency range from 0.4 to 10.0 cycles/degree. The strength of visual illusion was assessed by means of motor response using “tracking.” Measurements were carried out before the start of immersion, on the 1st, 3rd, 5th days of DI, and after its completion. Under conditions of “dry” immersion without HFEMS, upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions (BG and DI1) we observed significant differences in contrast sensitivity in the low spatial frequency range, whereas in the experiment with HFEMS—in the medium spatial frequency range. In the experiment without HFEMS, the Müller-Lyer illusion in microgravity conditions was absent, while in the experiment using HFEMS it was significantly above zero at all stages. Thus, we obtained only limited evidence in favor of the hypothesis of a possible compensating effect of HFEMS on changes in visual sensitivity upon the transition from gravity to microgravity conditions and vice versa. The study is a pilot and requires further research on the effect of HFEMS on visual sensitivity.

KW - contrast sensitivity

KW - electromyostimulation

KW - gravity

KW - illusions

KW - “dry” immersion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122483565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fncir.2021.702792

DO - 10.3389/fncir.2021.702792

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85122483565

VL - 15

JO - Frontiers in Neural Circuits

JF - Frontiers in Neural Circuits

SN - 1662-5110

M1 - 702792

ER -

ID: 91728838