Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Role of Students and Supervisors’ Interaction in Research Projects: Expectations and Evaluations. / Moskvicheva, N.; Bordovskaia, N.; Darinskaya, L.
In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 171, 2015, p. 576-583.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of Students and Supervisors’ Interaction in Research Projects: Expectations and Evaluations
AU - Moskvicheva, N.
AU - Bordovskaia, N.
AU - Darinskaya, L.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The success of research projects largely depends on the interaction of students and supervisors. Purposes of the study were to identify the students’ expectations of interaction; and to compare the subjective supervisors’ estimates of students’ research abilities with students’ research abilities measured by objective indicators. A sample consisted of students (bachelors, masters, graduates) and supervisors from different faculties of St.-Petersburg State University. The questionnaire; content analysis; psycho diagnostic techniques for studying students’ intellectual abilities and research potential, and 10-point assessment scales for supervisors were used. Students’ expectations from supervisors were described. It was shown that supervisors’ evaluations were often inexact and correlated more with external indicators of research activity of students than with their intellectual capacities. Necessity of focused work to improve the accuracy of the mutual understanding of students and supervisors was substantiat
AB - The success of research projects largely depends on the interaction of students and supervisors. Purposes of the study were to identify the students’ expectations of interaction; and to compare the subjective supervisors’ estimates of students’ research abilities with students’ research abilities measured by objective indicators. A sample consisted of students (bachelors, masters, graduates) and supervisors from different faculties of St.-Petersburg State University. The questionnaire; content analysis; psycho diagnostic techniques for studying students’ intellectual abilities and research potential, and 10-point assessment scales for supervisors were used. Students’ expectations from supervisors were described. It was shown that supervisors’ evaluations were often inexact and correlated more with external indicators of research activity of students than with their intellectual capacities. Necessity of focused work to improve the accuracy of the mutual understanding of students and supervisors was substantiat
KW - student
KW - supervisor
KW - the interaction
KW - reseach project.
U2 - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.163
DO - 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.163
M3 - Article
VL - 171
SP - 576
EP - 583
JO - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
JF - Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
SN - 1877-0428
ER -
ID: 5760381