Standard

Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia. / Плешак, Даниил Геннадьевич.

In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, No. 23-2, 2019, p. 856-866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Плешак, ДГ 2019, 'Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia.', Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, no. 23-2, pp. 856-866. <http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38509491>

APA

Плешак, Д. Г. (2019). Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia. Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология, (23-2), 856-866. http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38509491

Vancouver

Плешак ДГ. Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia. Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2019;(23-2):856-866.

Author

Плешак, Даниил Геннадьевич. / Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia. In: Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология. 2019 ; No. 23-2. pp. 856-866.

BibTeX

@article{05e9e8d5464346769bbb1f6afa1b597b,
title = "Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia.",
abstract = "In Heraclium is the earliest extant poem by George of Pisidia. The poem does not contain reference to the date of its composition, nor is any external evidence present. Overall, the main assumption has been that it was written to celebrate Heraclius{\textquoteright} ascent to the throne, after his victory in a revolt against the usurper Phocas. The two main datings are late 610 - early 611 CE, or 618 CE. The present study shows discrepancies between the rules for the panegyrical genre, which the poem is usually ascribed to, and its actual content. The main differences are absence of any reference to Heraclius{\textquoteright} background and lack of proper treatment of Heraclius as an emperor. The article shows that all these features are present in the majority of survived verse and prose panegyrics to the emperors, whether they are in Greek or in Latin. Moreover, the poem digresses from the rules set out for an imperial panegyric by the Greek rhetorician Menander, whose recommendation George of Pisidia normally follows, as it has been show",
keywords = "Byzantine poetry, George of Pisidia, Heraclius, византийская поэзия, Георгий Писида, Ираклий, Byzantine poetry, George of Pisidia, Heraclius, византийская поэзия, Георгий Писида, Ираклий",
author = "Плешак, {Даниил Геннадьевич}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
pages = "856--866",
journal = "Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология",
issn = "2306-9015",
publisher = "Институт лингвистических исследований РАН",
number = "23-2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revising the genre and the date of In Heraclium by George of Pisidia.

AU - Плешак, Даниил Геннадьевич

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In Heraclium is the earliest extant poem by George of Pisidia. The poem does not contain reference to the date of its composition, nor is any external evidence present. Overall, the main assumption has been that it was written to celebrate Heraclius’ ascent to the throne, after his victory in a revolt against the usurper Phocas. The two main datings are late 610 - early 611 CE, or 618 CE. The present study shows discrepancies between the rules for the panegyrical genre, which the poem is usually ascribed to, and its actual content. The main differences are absence of any reference to Heraclius’ background and lack of proper treatment of Heraclius as an emperor. The article shows that all these features are present in the majority of survived verse and prose panegyrics to the emperors, whether they are in Greek or in Latin. Moreover, the poem digresses from the rules set out for an imperial panegyric by the Greek rhetorician Menander, whose recommendation George of Pisidia normally follows, as it has been show

AB - In Heraclium is the earliest extant poem by George of Pisidia. The poem does not contain reference to the date of its composition, nor is any external evidence present. Overall, the main assumption has been that it was written to celebrate Heraclius’ ascent to the throne, after his victory in a revolt against the usurper Phocas. The two main datings are late 610 - early 611 CE, or 618 CE. The present study shows discrepancies between the rules for the panegyrical genre, which the poem is usually ascribed to, and its actual content. The main differences are absence of any reference to Heraclius’ background and lack of proper treatment of Heraclius as an emperor. The article shows that all these features are present in the majority of survived verse and prose panegyrics to the emperors, whether they are in Greek or in Latin. Moreover, the poem digresses from the rules set out for an imperial panegyric by the Greek rhetorician Menander, whose recommendation George of Pisidia normally follows, as it has been show

KW - Byzantine poetry

KW - George of Pisidia

KW - Heraclius

KW - византийская поэзия

KW - Георгий Писида

KW - Ираклий

KW - Byzantine poetry

KW - George of Pisidia

KW - Heraclius

KW - византийская поэзия

KW - Георгий Писида

KW - Ираклий

M3 - Article

SP - 856

EP - 866

JO - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

JF - Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология

SN - 2306-9015

IS - 23-2

ER -

ID: 78425411