Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Replicated anthropogenic hybridisations reveal parallel patterns of admixture in marine mussels. / Simon, Alexis; Arbiol, Christine; Nielsen, Einar Eg; Couteau, Jérôme; Sussarellu, Rossana; Burgeot, Thierry; Bernard, Ismaël; Coolen, Joop W.P.; Lamy, Jean-Baptiste; Robert, Stéphane; Skazina, Maria; Strelkov, Petr; Queiroga, Henrique; Cancio, Ibon; Welch, John J.; Viard, Frédérique; Bierne, Nicolas.
In: Evolutionary Applications, 22.11.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Replicated anthropogenic hybridisations reveal parallel patterns of admixture in marine mussels
AU - Simon, Alexis
AU - Arbiol, Christine
AU - Nielsen, Einar Eg
AU - Couteau, Jérôme
AU - Sussarellu, Rossana
AU - Burgeot, Thierry
AU - Bernard, Ismaël
AU - Coolen, Joop W.P.
AU - Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
AU - Robert, Stéphane
AU - Skazina, Maria
AU - Strelkov, Petr
AU - Queiroga, Henrique
AU - Cancio, Ibon
AU - Welch, John J.
AU - Viard, Frédérique
AU - Bierne, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/11/22
Y1 - 2019/11/22
N2 - Human‐mediated transport creates secondary contacts between genetically differentiated lineages, bringing new opportunities for gene exchange. When similar introductions occur in different places, they provide informally replicated experiments for studying hybridisation. We here examined 4279 Mytilus mussels, sampled in Europe and genotyped with 77 ancestry informative markers. We identified a type of introduced mussels, called ‘dock mussels’, associated with port habitats and displaying a particular genetic signal of admixture between M. edulis and the Mediterranean lineage of M. galloprovincialis. These mussels exhibit similarities in their ancestry compositions, regardless of the local native genetic backgrounds and the distance separating colonised ports. We observed fine‐scale genetic shifts at the port entrance, at scales below natural dispersal distance. Such sharp clines do not fit with migration‐selection tension zone models, and instead suggest habitat choice and early stage adaptation to the port environment, possibly coupled with connectivity barriers. Variations in the spread and admixture patterns of dock mussels seem to be influenced by the local native genetic backgrounds encountered. We next examined departures from the average admixture rate at different loci, and compared human‐mediated admixture events, to naturally admixed populations and experimental crosses. When the same M. galloprovincialis background was involved, positive correlations in the departures of loci across locations were found; but when different backgrounds were involved, no or negative correlations were observed. While some observed positive correlations might be best explained by a shared history and saltatory colonisation, others are likely produced by parallel selective events. Altogether, genome‐wide effect of admixture seems repeatable, and more dependent on genetic background than environmental context. Our results pave the way towards further genomic analyses of admixture, and monitoring of the spread of dock mussels both at large and fine spacial scales.
AB - Human‐mediated transport creates secondary contacts between genetically differentiated lineages, bringing new opportunities for gene exchange. When similar introductions occur in different places, they provide informally replicated experiments for studying hybridisation. We here examined 4279 Mytilus mussels, sampled in Europe and genotyped with 77 ancestry informative markers. We identified a type of introduced mussels, called ‘dock mussels’, associated with port habitats and displaying a particular genetic signal of admixture between M. edulis and the Mediterranean lineage of M. galloprovincialis. These mussels exhibit similarities in their ancestry compositions, regardless of the local native genetic backgrounds and the distance separating colonised ports. We observed fine‐scale genetic shifts at the port entrance, at scales below natural dispersal distance. Such sharp clines do not fit with migration‐selection tension zone models, and instead suggest habitat choice and early stage adaptation to the port environment, possibly coupled with connectivity barriers. Variations in the spread and admixture patterns of dock mussels seem to be influenced by the local native genetic backgrounds encountered. We next examined departures from the average admixture rate at different loci, and compared human‐mediated admixture events, to naturally admixed populations and experimental crosses. When the same M. galloprovincialis background was involved, positive correlations in the departures of loci across locations were found; but when different backgrounds were involved, no or negative correlations were observed. While some observed positive correlations might be best explained by a shared history and saltatory colonisation, others are likely produced by parallel selective events. Altogether, genome‐wide effect of admixture seems repeatable, and more dependent on genetic background than environmental context. Our results pave the way towards further genomic analyses of admixture, and monitoring of the spread of dock mussels both at large and fine spacial scales.
KW - biological introductions
KW - bentho-pelagic species
KW - ports
KW - secondary contact
KW - clines
KW - admixture
KW - biological introductions
KW - bentho‐pelagic species
KW - ports
KW - secondary contact
KW - clines
KW - Admixture
KW - bentho-pelagic species
KW - admixture
KW - COAST POPULATIONS
KW - EDULIS
KW - OCEAN SPRAWL
KW - MYTILUS-GALLOPROVINCIALIS LMK
KW - INTROGRESSION
KW - GENETIC DIVERSITY
KW - BLUE MUSSELS
KW - MOSAIC HYBRID ZONE
KW - BALLAST-WATER
KW - R-PACKAGE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075485363&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/replicated-anthropogenic-hybridisations-reveal-parallel-patterns-admixture-marine-mussels
U2 - 10.1111/eva.12879
DO - 10.1111/eva.12879
M3 - Article
JO - Evolutionary Applications
JF - Evolutionary Applications
SN - 1752-4571
ER -
ID: 48610886