Standard

Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse. / Sitnov, M. I.; Stephens, G. K.; Tsyganenko, N. A. ; Korth, H.; Roelof, E. C.; Brandt, P. C.; Merkin, V. G.; Ukhorskiy, A. Y.

In: Space Weather, Vol. 18, No. 10, e2020SW002561, 01.10.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Sitnov, MI, Stephens, GK, Tsyganenko, NA, Korth, H, Roelof, EC, Brandt, PC, Merkin, VG & Ukhorskiy, AY 2020, 'Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse', Space Weather, vol. 18, no. 10, e2020SW002561. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002561

APA

Sitnov, M. I., Stephens, G. K., Tsyganenko, N. A., Korth, H., Roelof, E. C., Brandt, P. C., Merkin, V. G., & Ukhorskiy, A. Y. (2020). Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse. Space Weather, 18(10), [e2020SW002561]. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002561

Vancouver

Sitnov MI, Stephens GK, Tsyganenko NA, Korth H, Roelof EC, Brandt PC et al. Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse. Space Weather. 2020 Oct 1;18(10). e2020SW002561. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002561

Author

Sitnov, M. I. ; Stephens, G. K. ; Tsyganenko, N. A. ; Korth, H. ; Roelof, E. C. ; Brandt, P. C. ; Merkin, V. G. ; Ukhorskiy, A. Y. / Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse. In: Space Weather. 2020 ; Vol. 18, No. 10.

BibTeX

@article{1f86294c0d0c4592ab91f2bfbefda49d,
title = "Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse",
abstract = "Reconstruction of the magnetic field, electric current, and plasma pressure is provided using a new data mining (DM) method with weighted nearest neighbors (NN) for strong storms with the storm activity index Sym‐H < −300 nT, the Bastille Day event (July 2000), and the 20 November 2003 superstorm. It is shown that the new method significantly reduces the statistical bias of the original NN algorithm toward weaker storms. In the DM approach the magnetic field is reconstructed using a small NN subset of the large historical database, with the subset number KNN ≫ 1 being still much larger than any simultaneous multiprobe observation number. This allows one to fit with observations a very flexible magnetic field model using basis function expansions for equatorial and field‐aligned currents, and at the same time, to keep the model sensitive to storm variability. This also allows one to calculate the plasma pressure by integrating the quasi‐static force balance equation with the isotropic plasma approximation. For strong storms of particular importance becomes the resolution of the eastward current, which prevents the divergence of the pressure integral. It is shown that in spite of the strong reduction of the dominant NN number in the new weighted NN algorithm to capture strong storm features, it is still possible to resolve the eastward current and to retrieve plasma pressure distributions. It is found that the pressure peak for strong storms may be as close as ≈2.1RE to Earth and its value may exceed 300 nPa.",
keywords = "magnetic storms, extreme events, ring current pressure, data mining, nearest neighbors method, Machine learning, machine learning",
author = "Sitnov, {M. I.} and Stephens, {G. K.} and Tsyganenko, {N. A.} and H. Korth and Roelof, {E. C.} and Brandt, {P. C.} and Merkin, {V. G.} and Ukhorskiy, {A. Y.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright}2020. The Authors.",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2020SW002561",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Space Weather",
issn = "1542-7390",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconstruction of Extreme Geomagnetic Storms: Breaking the Data Paucity Curse

AU - Sitnov, M. I.

AU - Stephens, G. K.

AU - Tsyganenko, N. A.

AU - Korth, H.

AU - Roelof, E. C.

AU - Brandt, P. C.

AU - Merkin, V. G.

AU - Ukhorskiy, A. Y.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: ©2020. The Authors.

PY - 2020/10/1

Y1 - 2020/10/1

N2 - Reconstruction of the magnetic field, electric current, and plasma pressure is provided using a new data mining (DM) method with weighted nearest neighbors (NN) for strong storms with the storm activity index Sym‐H < −300 nT, the Bastille Day event (July 2000), and the 20 November 2003 superstorm. It is shown that the new method significantly reduces the statistical bias of the original NN algorithm toward weaker storms. In the DM approach the magnetic field is reconstructed using a small NN subset of the large historical database, with the subset number KNN ≫ 1 being still much larger than any simultaneous multiprobe observation number. This allows one to fit with observations a very flexible magnetic field model using basis function expansions for equatorial and field‐aligned currents, and at the same time, to keep the model sensitive to storm variability. This also allows one to calculate the plasma pressure by integrating the quasi‐static force balance equation with the isotropic plasma approximation. For strong storms of particular importance becomes the resolution of the eastward current, which prevents the divergence of the pressure integral. It is shown that in spite of the strong reduction of the dominant NN number in the new weighted NN algorithm to capture strong storm features, it is still possible to resolve the eastward current and to retrieve plasma pressure distributions. It is found that the pressure peak for strong storms may be as close as ≈2.1RE to Earth and its value may exceed 300 nPa.

AB - Reconstruction of the magnetic field, electric current, and plasma pressure is provided using a new data mining (DM) method with weighted nearest neighbors (NN) for strong storms with the storm activity index Sym‐H < −300 nT, the Bastille Day event (July 2000), and the 20 November 2003 superstorm. It is shown that the new method significantly reduces the statistical bias of the original NN algorithm toward weaker storms. In the DM approach the magnetic field is reconstructed using a small NN subset of the large historical database, with the subset number KNN ≫ 1 being still much larger than any simultaneous multiprobe observation number. This allows one to fit with observations a very flexible magnetic field model using basis function expansions for equatorial and field‐aligned currents, and at the same time, to keep the model sensitive to storm variability. This also allows one to calculate the plasma pressure by integrating the quasi‐static force balance equation with the isotropic plasma approximation. For strong storms of particular importance becomes the resolution of the eastward current, which prevents the divergence of the pressure integral. It is shown that in spite of the strong reduction of the dominant NN number in the new weighted NN algorithm to capture strong storm features, it is still possible to resolve the eastward current and to retrieve plasma pressure distributions. It is found that the pressure peak for strong storms may be as close as ≈2.1RE to Earth and its value may exceed 300 nPa.

KW - magnetic storms

KW - extreme events

KW - ring current pressure

KW - data mining

KW - nearest neighbors method

KW - Machine learning

KW - machine learning

UR - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020SW002561

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093929657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2020SW002561

DO - 10.1029/2020SW002561

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Space Weather

JF - Space Weather

SN - 1542-7390

IS - 10

M1 - e2020SW002561

ER -

ID: 70437005