Standard

QSAR analysis of immune recognition for triazine herbicides based on immunoassay data for polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. / Buglak, A.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Lei, Hong-Tao; Dzantiev, B.B.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 4, e0214879, 01.04.2019, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Buglak, A.A. ; Zherdev, A.V. ; Lei, Hong-Tao ; Dzantiev, B.B. / QSAR analysis of immune recognition for triazine herbicides based on immunoassay data for polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. In: PLoS ONE. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 1-19.

BibTeX

@article{982fd7e715a1419096f9ee964cae5519,
title = "QSAR analysis of immune recognition for triazine herbicides based on immunoassay data for polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies",
abstract = "A common task in the immunodetection of structurally close compounds is to analyze the selectivity of immune recognition; it is required to understand the regularities of immune recognition and to elucidate the basic structural elements which provide it. Triazines are compounds of particular interest for such research due to their high variability and the necessity of their monitoring to provide safety for agricultural products and foodstuffs. We evaluated the binding of 20 triazines with polyclonal (pAb) and monoclonal (mAb) antibodies obtained using atrazine as the immunogenic hapten. A total of over 3000 descriptors were used in the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of binding activities (pIC 50 ). A comparison of the two enzyme immunoassay systems showed that the system with pAb is much easier to describe using 2D QSAR methodology, while the system with mAb can be described using the 3D QSAR CoMFA. Thus, for the 3D QSAR model of the polyclonal antibodies, the main statistical parameter q 2 ({\textquoteleft}leave-many-out{\textquoteright}) is equal to 0.498, and for monoclonal antibodies, q 2 is equal to 0.566. Obviously, in the case of pAb, we deal with several targets, while in the case of mAb the target is one, and therefore it is easier to describe it using specific fields of molecular interactions distributed in space. ",
author = "A.A. Buglak and A.V. Zherdev and Hong-Tao Lei and B.B. Dzantiev",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0214879",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - QSAR analysis of immune recognition for triazine herbicides based on immunoassay data for polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies

AU - Buglak, A.A.

AU - Zherdev, A.V.

AU - Lei, Hong-Tao

AU - Dzantiev, B.B.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - A common task in the immunodetection of structurally close compounds is to analyze the selectivity of immune recognition; it is required to understand the regularities of immune recognition and to elucidate the basic structural elements which provide it. Triazines are compounds of particular interest for such research due to their high variability and the necessity of their monitoring to provide safety for agricultural products and foodstuffs. We evaluated the binding of 20 triazines with polyclonal (pAb) and monoclonal (mAb) antibodies obtained using atrazine as the immunogenic hapten. A total of over 3000 descriptors were used in the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of binding activities (pIC 50 ). A comparison of the two enzyme immunoassay systems showed that the system with pAb is much easier to describe using 2D QSAR methodology, while the system with mAb can be described using the 3D QSAR CoMFA. Thus, for the 3D QSAR model of the polyclonal antibodies, the main statistical parameter q 2 (‘leave-many-out’) is equal to 0.498, and for monoclonal antibodies, q 2 is equal to 0.566. Obviously, in the case of pAb, we deal with several targets, while in the case of mAb the target is one, and therefore it is easier to describe it using specific fields of molecular interactions distributed in space.

AB - A common task in the immunodetection of structurally close compounds is to analyze the selectivity of immune recognition; it is required to understand the regularities of immune recognition and to elucidate the basic structural elements which provide it. Triazines are compounds of particular interest for such research due to their high variability and the necessity of their monitoring to provide safety for agricultural products and foodstuffs. We evaluated the binding of 20 triazines with polyclonal (pAb) and monoclonal (mAb) antibodies obtained using atrazine as the immunogenic hapten. A total of over 3000 descriptors were used in the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of binding activities (pIC 50 ). A comparison of the two enzyme immunoassay systems showed that the system with pAb is much easier to describe using 2D QSAR methodology, while the system with mAb can be described using the 3D QSAR CoMFA. Thus, for the 3D QSAR model of the polyclonal antibodies, the main statistical parameter q 2 (‘leave-many-out’) is equal to 0.498, and for monoclonal antibodies, q 2 is equal to 0.566. Obviously, in the case of pAb, we deal with several targets, while in the case of mAb the target is one, and therefore it is easier to describe it using specific fields of molecular interactions distributed in space.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063782021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/qsar-analysis-immune-recognition-triazine-herbicides-based-immunoassay-data-polyclonal-monoclonal-an

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0214879

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0214879

M3 - Article

C2 - 30943259

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e0214879

ER -

ID: 42853459