Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards. / Бродский, Андрей Константинович; Абакумов, Евгений Васильевич; Кириллова, Юлия Александровна.
In: Diversity, Vol. 15, No. 3, 337, 27.02.2023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards
AU - Бродский, Андрей Константинович
AU - Абакумов, Евгений Васильевич
AU - Кириллова, Юлия Александровна
N1 - Brodsky, A.; Abakumov, E.; Kirillova, I. Problems in Threatened Species Conservation: Differences in National Red Lists Assessments with Global Standards. Diversity 2023, 15, 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ d15030337
PY - 2023/2/27
Y1 - 2023/2/27
N2 - The solution of transnational environmental problems in the field of the protection of threatened species and conservation biology directly depends on the level of international communication, which can significantly decrease due to differences in Red Lists and Red Data Books of different levels. In order to identify the similarities and differences in approaches to the assessment ofnational Red Lists and Books of the Baltic Sea region countries (Russia, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania, Finland, Poland and Sweden) with the IUCN Red List, a comparative analysis was carried out. It was determined that the level of discrepancy between Red Data Lists and Books varies considerably,with differences in the scales of species categories, species lists and categories. Most of the threatened species at the national level are not listed under the IUCN Red List, while species in a more stringent category at the national level prevail (37% and 3% on average, respectively). However, national Red Lists and Red Data Books do not take into account the global trend of the risk of extinction of species. The percentage of species with insufficient information to define a category at the national or global level ranges from 6% to 28%. These discrepancies make it difficult to exchange data on threatenedspecies and create a unified database with information on protected species at different levels and, therefore, reduce the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation activities at regional and internationallevels. The results also demonstrate that countries have an international responsibility to conserve a species, and the cases identified can provide useful additional information to guide a national conservation strategy.
AB - The solution of transnational environmental problems in the field of the protection of threatened species and conservation biology directly depends on the level of international communication, which can significantly decrease due to differences in Red Lists and Red Data Books of different levels. In order to identify the similarities and differences in approaches to the assessment ofnational Red Lists and Books of the Baltic Sea region countries (Russia, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania, Finland, Poland and Sweden) with the IUCN Red List, a comparative analysis was carried out. It was determined that the level of discrepancy between Red Data Lists and Books varies considerably,with differences in the scales of species categories, species lists and categories. Most of the threatened species at the national level are not listed under the IUCN Red List, while species in a more stringent category at the national level prevail (37% and 3% on average, respectively). However, national Red Lists and Red Data Books do not take into account the global trend of the risk of extinction of species. The percentage of species with insufficient information to define a category at the national or global level ranges from 6% to 28%. These discrepancies make it difficult to exchange data on threatenedspecies and create a unified database with information on protected species at different levels and, therefore, reduce the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation activities at regional and internationallevels. The results also demonstrate that countries have an international responsibility to conserve a species, and the cases identified can provide useful additional information to guide a national conservation strategy.
KW - red lists
KW - red data books
KW - Baltic region
KW - threatened species;
KW - species categories
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d6c1b7a0-d2a6-32b0-88fc-e1348cd4f780/
U2 - 10.3390/d15030337
DO - 10.3390/d15030337
M3 - Article
VL - 15
JO - Diversity
JF - Diversity
SN - 1424-2818
IS - 3
M1 - 337
ER -
ID: 103947038