Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Predictive Patterns and Market Efficiency: A Deep Learning Approach to Financial Time Series Forecasting. / Vuković, D.B.; Radenković, S.D.; Simeunović, I.; Zinovev, V.; Radovanović, M.
In: Mathematics, Vol. 12, No. 19, 30.09.2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive Patterns and Market Efficiency: A Deep Learning Approach to Financial Time Series Forecasting
AU - Vuković, D.B.
AU - Radenković, S.D.
AU - Simeunović, I.
AU - Zinovev, V.
AU - Radovanović, M.
N1 - Export Date: 27 October 2024
PY - 2024/9/30
Y1 - 2024/9/30
N2 - This study explores market efficiency and behavior by integrating key theories such as the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH), Informational Efficiency and Random Walk theory. Using LSTM enhanced by optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adam, AdaGrad, and RMSprop, we analyze market inefficiencies in the Standard and Poor’s (SPX) index over a 22-year period. Our results reveal “pockets in time” that challenge EMH predictions, particularly with the AdaGrad optimizer at a size of the hidden layer (HS) of 64. Beyond forecasting, we apply the Dominguez–Lobato (DL) and General Spectral (GS) tests as part of the Martingale Difference Hypothesis to assess statistical inefficiencies and deviations from the Random Walk model. By emphasizing “informational efficiency”, we examine how quickly new information is reflected in stock prices. We argue that market inefficiencies are transient phenomena influenced by structural shifts and information flow, challenging the notion that forecasting alone can refute EMH. Additionally, we compare LSTM with ARIMA with Exponential Smoothing, and LightGBM to highlight the strengths and limitations of these models in financial forecasting. The LSTM model excels at capturing temporal dependencies, while LightGBM demonstrates its effectiveness in detecting non-linear relationships. Our comprehensive approach offers a nuanced understanding of market dynamics and inefficiencies. © 2024 by the authors.
AB - This study explores market efficiency and behavior by integrating key theories such as the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH), Informational Efficiency and Random Walk theory. Using LSTM enhanced by optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adam, AdaGrad, and RMSprop, we analyze market inefficiencies in the Standard and Poor’s (SPX) index over a 22-year period. Our results reveal “pockets in time” that challenge EMH predictions, particularly with the AdaGrad optimizer at a size of the hidden layer (HS) of 64. Beyond forecasting, we apply the Dominguez–Lobato (DL) and General Spectral (GS) tests as part of the Martingale Difference Hypothesis to assess statistical inefficiencies and deviations from the Random Walk model. By emphasizing “informational efficiency”, we examine how quickly new information is reflected in stock prices. We argue that market inefficiencies are transient phenomena influenced by structural shifts and information flow, challenging the notion that forecasting alone can refute EMH. Additionally, we compare LSTM with ARIMA with Exponential Smoothing, and LightGBM to highlight the strengths and limitations of these models in financial forecasting. The LSTM model excels at capturing temporal dependencies, while LightGBM demonstrates its effectiveness in detecting non-linear relationships. Our comprehensive approach offers a nuanced understanding of market dynamics and inefficiencies. © 2024 by the authors.
KW - dynamics in market efficiency
KW - efficient market hypothesis
KW - forecasting
KW - LSTM optimization
KW - machine learning
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7bac8d36-34c1-38bc-b57a-28acc82169c6/
U2 - 10.3390/math12193066
DO - 10.3390/math12193066
M3 - статья
VL - 12
JO - Mathematics
JF - Mathematics
SN - 2227-7390
IS - 19
ER -
ID: 126463551