Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{71103d9e55f943158d30b88ce441035f,
title = "Physical correctness of numerical modeling electrohydrodynamic processes in two-phase immiscible liquids basing on the phase-field and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods",
abstract = "The paper examines two numerical approaches to the simulation of electrical deformation and coalescence processes in water-in-oil emulsions: the phase-field method and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach. The former employs a diffuse interface, while the latter utilizes a sharp interface. The study analyzes the correctness of the computer simulation results and identifies less obvious limits of the applicability of these numerical techniques. The paper is based on a step-by-step comparison of data from two independent numerical models and quantitative verification using original experimental data, including data on unsteady-state droplet deformation and the threshold between coalescence and non-coalescence. The main findings are as follows. Both methods, the modified phase-field approach and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian one, are fundamentally capable of providing physically and quantitatively correct results for modeling electrohydrodynamic processes in two-phase immiscible liquids. On the one hand, the phase-field method demands thorough tuning and has limited applicability for simulating long-term processes. On the other hand, the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach offers greater precision and requires fewer computational resources compared to the phase-field method, although it demands a manual adjustment of geometry when the system's topology changes. It is noteworthy that the phase-field method, without careful tuning, fails to yield quantitatively accurate results; errors, such as discrepancies in the time convergence of droplets under the influence of an electric field, can reach magnitudes of tens of percentages.",
keywords = "Droplet-droplet interaction, Electrical coalescence, Electrodeformation, Noncoalescence, Numerical simulation, Water-in-oil emulsion",
author = "Чирков, {Владимир Александрович} and Утюгов, {Григорий Олегович} and Костин, {Петр Алексеевич} and Самусенко, {Андрей Викторович}",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104881",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
journal = "International Journal of Multiphase Flow",
issn = "0301-9322",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical correctness of numerical modeling electrohydrodynamic processes in two-phase immiscible liquids basing on the phase-field and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods

AU - Чирков, Владимир Александрович

AU - Утюгов, Григорий Олегович

AU - Костин, Петр Алексеевич

AU - Самусенко, Андрей Викторович

PY - 2024/7/1

Y1 - 2024/7/1

N2 - The paper examines two numerical approaches to the simulation of electrical deformation and coalescence processes in water-in-oil emulsions: the phase-field method and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach. The former employs a diffuse interface, while the latter utilizes a sharp interface. The study analyzes the correctness of the computer simulation results and identifies less obvious limits of the applicability of these numerical techniques. The paper is based on a step-by-step comparison of data from two independent numerical models and quantitative verification using original experimental data, including data on unsteady-state droplet deformation and the threshold between coalescence and non-coalescence. The main findings are as follows. Both methods, the modified phase-field approach and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian one, are fundamentally capable of providing physically and quantitatively correct results for modeling electrohydrodynamic processes in two-phase immiscible liquids. On the one hand, the phase-field method demands thorough tuning and has limited applicability for simulating long-term processes. On the other hand, the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach offers greater precision and requires fewer computational resources compared to the phase-field method, although it demands a manual adjustment of geometry when the system's topology changes. It is noteworthy that the phase-field method, without careful tuning, fails to yield quantitatively accurate results; errors, such as discrepancies in the time convergence of droplets under the influence of an electric field, can reach magnitudes of tens of percentages.

AB - The paper examines two numerical approaches to the simulation of electrical deformation and coalescence processes in water-in-oil emulsions: the phase-field method and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach. The former employs a diffuse interface, while the latter utilizes a sharp interface. The study analyzes the correctness of the computer simulation results and identifies less obvious limits of the applicability of these numerical techniques. The paper is based on a step-by-step comparison of data from two independent numerical models and quantitative verification using original experimental data, including data on unsteady-state droplet deformation and the threshold between coalescence and non-coalescence. The main findings are as follows. Both methods, the modified phase-field approach and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian one, are fundamentally capable of providing physically and quantitatively correct results for modeling electrohydrodynamic processes in two-phase immiscible liquids. On the one hand, the phase-field method demands thorough tuning and has limited applicability for simulating long-term processes. On the other hand, the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach offers greater precision and requires fewer computational resources compared to the phase-field method, although it demands a manual adjustment of geometry when the system's topology changes. It is noteworthy that the phase-field method, without careful tuning, fails to yield quantitatively accurate results; errors, such as discrepancies in the time convergence of droplets under the influence of an electric field, can reach magnitudes of tens of percentages.

KW - Droplet-droplet interaction

KW - Electrical coalescence

KW - Electrodeformation

KW - Noncoalescence

KW - Numerical simulation

KW - Water-in-oil emulsion

UR - https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1jAjw14fiIzJOp

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/565823f2-9c84-395a-bebc-775de884471d/

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104881

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104881

M3 - Article

VL - 177

JO - International Journal of Multiphase Flow

JF - International Journal of Multiphase Flow

SN - 0301-9322

M1 - 104881

ER -

ID: 120073077