The contribution deals with Sat. 118, 3, in which most editors accept the emendation vanitatem instead of the manuscript reading sanitatem. Though the conjecture obviously makes sense, it seems to be a banalization of the text. Trying to defend and explain the manuscript reading, I concentrate on the usage of the word sanitas in rhetorical discourse, where it has a specific meaning, and examine the examples of its usage in the treatises of Cicero, Quintilian and Tacitus.
Translated title of the contributionPETRON. SAT. 118, 3: SANITAS ИЛИ VANITAS: ЧТО СКОРЕЕ ОТВЕРГНЕТ ОДАРЕННЫЙ ДУХ?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-135
JournalPhilologia Classica
Volume12
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2017

    Research areas

  • PETRONIUS, SATYRICON, rhetoric, TEXT CRITICISM, LATIN STYLISTIC TERMINOLOGY

ID: 42905598