Standard

Paul Delaroche : The reception of his work in Russia. / Чернышева, Мария Александровна.

In: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2019, p. 577-589.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Чернышева, МА 2019, 'Paul Delaroche: The reception of his work in Russia', ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 577-589. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.308

APA

Чернышева, М. А. (2019). Paul Delaroche: The reception of his work in Russia. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ, 9(3), 577-589. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.308

Vancouver

Чернышева МА. Paul Delaroche: The reception of his work in Russia. ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ. 2019;9(3):577-589. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.308

Author

Чернышева, Мария Александровна. / Paul Delaroche : The reception of his work in Russia. In: ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 577-589.

BibTeX

@article{eb21f4f6230d41598931af10f95988d7,
title = "Paul Delaroche: The reception of his work in Russia",
abstract = "Despite the existing body of literature on Paul Delaroche, this article is the first attempt to seriously assess his reception in nineteenth-century Russia. A study of how Delaroche was received by Russian critics, collectors and artists allows us take a new look both at the scale of his significance for nineteenth-century art as a whole and at certain key aspects of Russian artistic culture. The author analyses reviews of Delaroche's work in the Russian press, including some never previously discussed, and comments on Horace Vernet's celebrated statement that: “The emperor [Nicholas I] spoke with me at length about Delaroche. He has all his prints”. Looking at Anatoly Demidov's patronage of Delaroche, the article also touches on the Russian collector's relations with the tsar. The new concept of the “genre historique” that originated with Delaroche was taken up and developed most productively in Russia in the 1860s and 1870s, as the author demonstrates through an analysis of paintings by Vyacheslav Schwarz and Nikolay Ge, noting that their treatment of subjects from history was possible only in the more liberal age of Alexander II. It was under Delaroche's influence that both Schwarz and Ge created typologically new images of power and of the monarch (of Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great). In conclusion, the author draws attention to the paradoxical nature of Western self-identification by Russian nineteenth-century artists, which can be explained in part through a study of the Russian reception of the art of Delaroche.",
keywords = "historicism, Karl Bryullov, Nikolay Ge, nineteenth-century French art, Nineteenth-century Russian art, Paul Delaroche, realism, Russian-French artistic relations, Vyacheslav Schwarz, historicism, Karl Bryullov, Nikolay Ge, nineteenth-century French art, Nineteenth-century Russian art, Paul Delaroche, realism, Russian-French artistic relations, Vyacheslav Schwarz",
author = "Чернышева, {Мария Александровна}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.21638/spbu15.2019.308",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "577--589",
journal = " ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ",
issn = "2221-3007",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paul Delaroche

T2 - The reception of his work in Russia

AU - Чернышева, Мария Александровна

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Despite the existing body of literature on Paul Delaroche, this article is the first attempt to seriously assess his reception in nineteenth-century Russia. A study of how Delaroche was received by Russian critics, collectors and artists allows us take a new look both at the scale of his significance for nineteenth-century art as a whole and at certain key aspects of Russian artistic culture. The author analyses reviews of Delaroche's work in the Russian press, including some never previously discussed, and comments on Horace Vernet's celebrated statement that: “The emperor [Nicholas I] spoke with me at length about Delaroche. He has all his prints”. Looking at Anatoly Demidov's patronage of Delaroche, the article also touches on the Russian collector's relations with the tsar. The new concept of the “genre historique” that originated with Delaroche was taken up and developed most productively in Russia in the 1860s and 1870s, as the author demonstrates through an analysis of paintings by Vyacheslav Schwarz and Nikolay Ge, noting that their treatment of subjects from history was possible only in the more liberal age of Alexander II. It was under Delaroche's influence that both Schwarz and Ge created typologically new images of power and of the monarch (of Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great). In conclusion, the author draws attention to the paradoxical nature of Western self-identification by Russian nineteenth-century artists, which can be explained in part through a study of the Russian reception of the art of Delaroche.

AB - Despite the existing body of literature on Paul Delaroche, this article is the first attempt to seriously assess his reception in nineteenth-century Russia. A study of how Delaroche was received by Russian critics, collectors and artists allows us take a new look both at the scale of his significance for nineteenth-century art as a whole and at certain key aspects of Russian artistic culture. The author analyses reviews of Delaroche's work in the Russian press, including some never previously discussed, and comments on Horace Vernet's celebrated statement that: “The emperor [Nicholas I] spoke with me at length about Delaroche. He has all his prints”. Looking at Anatoly Demidov's patronage of Delaroche, the article also touches on the Russian collector's relations with the tsar. The new concept of the “genre historique” that originated with Delaroche was taken up and developed most productively in Russia in the 1860s and 1870s, as the author demonstrates through an analysis of paintings by Vyacheslav Schwarz and Nikolay Ge, noting that their treatment of subjects from history was possible only in the more liberal age of Alexander II. It was under Delaroche's influence that both Schwarz and Ge created typologically new images of power and of the monarch (of Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great). In conclusion, the author draws attention to the paradoxical nature of Western self-identification by Russian nineteenth-century artists, which can be explained in part through a study of the Russian reception of the art of Delaroche.

KW - historicism

KW - Karl Bryullov

KW - Nikolay Ge

KW - nineteenth-century French art

KW - Nineteenth-century Russian art

KW - Paul Delaroche

KW - realism

KW - Russian-French artistic relations

KW - Vyacheslav Schwarz

KW - historicism

KW - Karl Bryullov

KW - Nikolay Ge

KW - nineteenth-century French art

KW - Nineteenth-century Russian art

KW - Paul Delaroche

KW - realism

KW - Russian-French artistic relations

KW - Vyacheslav Schwarz

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077076100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21638/spbu15.2019.308

DO - 10.21638/spbu15.2019.308

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85077076100

VL - 9

SP - 577

EP - 589

JO - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ

JF - ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА. ИСКУССТВОВЕДЕНИЕ

SN - 2221-3007

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 48922452