Standard

ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS : NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM 27 March 2015, St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Philosophy. / Patkul, Andrei; Artemenko, Natalia.

In: HORIZON:ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2015, p. 240-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Harvard

Patkul, A & Artemenko, N 2015, 'ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS: NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM 27 March 2015, St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Philosophy', HORIZON:ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 240-307.

APA

Vancouver

Author

Patkul, Andrei ; Artemenko, Natalia. / ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS : NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM 27 March 2015, St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Philosophy. In: HORIZON:ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ. 2015 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 240-307.

BibTeX

@article{6bfebcb1da924219b959f88c4efd7651,
title = "ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS: NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM 27 March 2015, St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Philosophy",
abstract = "This publication is a transcript of the open disputation dedicated to the theme Ontology of Consciousness: Naturalism vs Transcendentalism, which has been held at March 27, 2015 at the Institute of Philosophy of St. Petersburg State University. Both positions, naturalism and transcendentalism, were presented by the teams of two experts, who offered to the public their vision of correlation between naturalism and transcendentalism as well as attacked the arguments of opposite side. Moreover, the audience had the possibility not only to put the questions to experts, but also to make short remarks on the subject of discussion. The following problems were discussed during the disputation time: the causal conditionality of the consciousness, constitution of the object of nature and belonging of consciousness to their realm, the possibility of the freedom inside the natural world, the perspectives of the naturalization of the phenomenology. But the consensus has not been reached. The range of opinions reached by the experts during the discussion was quite extensive: from the recognition that transcendentalism and naturalism are enemies, which fight each other until final victory, to the assumption of the possibility of mutual complementarity or at least a correction of its own thesis under the influence of criticism opposite side.",
keywords = "naturalism, transcendentalism, consciousness, subjectivity, freedom, causality, intentionality, constitution, mental states",
author = "Andrei Patkul and Natalia Artemenko",
year = "2015",
language = "не определен",
volume = "4",
pages = "240--307",
journal = "Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania",
issn = "2226-5260",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ONTOLOGY OF CONSCIOUSNESS

T2 - NATURALISM VS. TRANSCENDENTALISM 27 March 2015, St. Petersburg State University, Institute of Philosophy

AU - Patkul, Andrei

AU - Artemenko, Natalia

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This publication is a transcript of the open disputation dedicated to the theme Ontology of Consciousness: Naturalism vs Transcendentalism, which has been held at March 27, 2015 at the Institute of Philosophy of St. Petersburg State University. Both positions, naturalism and transcendentalism, were presented by the teams of two experts, who offered to the public their vision of correlation between naturalism and transcendentalism as well as attacked the arguments of opposite side. Moreover, the audience had the possibility not only to put the questions to experts, but also to make short remarks on the subject of discussion. The following problems were discussed during the disputation time: the causal conditionality of the consciousness, constitution of the object of nature and belonging of consciousness to their realm, the possibility of the freedom inside the natural world, the perspectives of the naturalization of the phenomenology. But the consensus has not been reached. The range of opinions reached by the experts during the discussion was quite extensive: from the recognition that transcendentalism and naturalism are enemies, which fight each other until final victory, to the assumption of the possibility of mutual complementarity or at least a correction of its own thesis under the influence of criticism opposite side.

AB - This publication is a transcript of the open disputation dedicated to the theme Ontology of Consciousness: Naturalism vs Transcendentalism, which has been held at March 27, 2015 at the Institute of Philosophy of St. Petersburg State University. Both positions, naturalism and transcendentalism, were presented by the teams of two experts, who offered to the public their vision of correlation between naturalism and transcendentalism as well as attacked the arguments of opposite side. Moreover, the audience had the possibility not only to put the questions to experts, but also to make short remarks on the subject of discussion. The following problems were discussed during the disputation time: the causal conditionality of the consciousness, constitution of the object of nature and belonging of consciousness to their realm, the possibility of the freedom inside the natural world, the perspectives of the naturalization of the phenomenology. But the consensus has not been reached. The range of opinions reached by the experts during the discussion was quite extensive: from the recognition that transcendentalism and naturalism are enemies, which fight each other until final victory, to the assumption of the possibility of mutual complementarity or at least a correction of its own thesis under the influence of criticism opposite side.

KW - naturalism

KW - transcendentalism

KW - consciousness

KW - subjectivity

KW - freedom

KW - causality

KW - intentionality

KW - constitution

KW - mental states

M3 - редакционная статья

VL - 4

SP - 240

EP - 307

JO - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania

JF - Horizon. Fenomenologiceskie Issledovania

SN - 2226-5260

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 42162915