Standard

On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics. / Шлыков, Арсений Андреевич; Шоттле, Стефан; Сараев, Александр Карпович; Бобров, Никита Юрьевич; Тезкан, Бюэлент ; Смирнова, Мария; Йогешвар, Притам.

In: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 03.10.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Шлыков, АА, Шоттле, С, Сараев, АК, Бобров, НЮ, Тезкан, Б, Смирнова, М & Йогешвар, П 2024, 'On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics', Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03478-0

APA

Шлыков, А. А., Шоттле, С., Сараев, А. К., Бобров, Н. Ю., Тезкан, Б., Смирнова, М., & Йогешвар, П. (2024). On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics. Pure and Applied Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03478-0

Vancouver

Author

Шлыков, Арсений Андреевич ; Шоттле, Стефан ; Сараев, Александр Карпович ; Бобров, Никита Юрьевич ; Тезкан, Бюэлент ; Смирнова, Мария ; Йогешвар, Притам. / On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics. In: Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2024.

BibTeX

@article{583ba3c04c2d49e89aa20504f8126724,
title = "On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics",
abstract = "In the controlled source radiomagnetotelluric (CSRMT) sounding method, different types of sources are in common use. However, no systematic examination of their advantages and disadvantages exists. In this paper, we analyze the electromagnetic fields of different CSRMT sources: horizontalelectric dipole, HED, horizontal magnetic dipole, HMD, and vertical magnetic dipole, VMD, using both numerical modelling and field data. Positions of the boundary between the far-field and transition zones have been determined. Using 1D and 2D modelling and results of field experiments, we have shown that the HMD source has the smallest transition zone, while the VMD source hasthe largest one. In general, the HMD and HED sources are preferred for soundings in the far-field zone, due to the versatility of the transmitter{\textquoteright}s geometry, and to the possibility of tensor measurements and use of 2D-3D magnetotelluric codes for data interpretation. In the case of the homogeneous half-space, for all sources the boundary between the transition and the far-field zone is farther away from a source for the impedance phase than for theapparent resistivity. Comparison of the signal magnitudes{\textquoteright} decay indicates that the field from the VMD source shows the slowest decrease with distance in the transition zone, while the field from the HMD source shows the fastest decrease, confirming the shorter range of measurements using the latter source. Using field experiments, we have compared the magnitudes of HED-, VMD-, andHMD-signals at odd subharmonics relative to the signal magnitude at the main frequency. We find that use of a HED source has definite advantage over loop sources for broadband frequency measurements with the square waveform from transmitter.",
keywords = "Controlled source radiomagnetotellurics, horizontal electric dipole, horizontal magnetic dipole, vertical magnetic dipole., Controlled source radiomagnetotellurics, horizontal electric dipole, horizontal magnetic dipole, vertical magnetic dipole",
author = "Шлыков, {Арсений Андреевич} and Стефан Шоттле and Сараев, {Александр Карпович} and Бобров, {Никита Юрьевич} and Бюэлент Тезкан and Мария Смирнова and Притам Йогешвар",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00024-024-03478-0",
language = "English",
journal = "Pure and Applied Geophysics",
issn = "0033-4553",
publisher = "Birkh{\"a}user Verlag AG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Use of Different Sources for Controlled Source Radiomagnetotellurics

AU - Шлыков, Арсений Андреевич

AU - Шоттле, Стефан

AU - Сараев, Александр Карпович

AU - Бобров, Никита Юрьевич

AU - Тезкан, Бюэлент

AU - Смирнова, Мария

AU - Йогешвар, Притам

PY - 2024/10/3

Y1 - 2024/10/3

N2 - In the controlled source radiomagnetotelluric (CSRMT) sounding method, different types of sources are in common use. However, no systematic examination of their advantages and disadvantages exists. In this paper, we analyze the electromagnetic fields of different CSRMT sources: horizontalelectric dipole, HED, horizontal magnetic dipole, HMD, and vertical magnetic dipole, VMD, using both numerical modelling and field data. Positions of the boundary between the far-field and transition zones have been determined. Using 1D and 2D modelling and results of field experiments, we have shown that the HMD source has the smallest transition zone, while the VMD source hasthe largest one. In general, the HMD and HED sources are preferred for soundings in the far-field zone, due to the versatility of the transmitter’s geometry, and to the possibility of tensor measurements and use of 2D-3D magnetotelluric codes for data interpretation. In the case of the homogeneous half-space, for all sources the boundary between the transition and the far-field zone is farther away from a source for the impedance phase than for theapparent resistivity. Comparison of the signal magnitudes’ decay indicates that the field from the VMD source shows the slowest decrease with distance in the transition zone, while the field from the HMD source shows the fastest decrease, confirming the shorter range of measurements using the latter source. Using field experiments, we have compared the magnitudes of HED-, VMD-, andHMD-signals at odd subharmonics relative to the signal magnitude at the main frequency. We find that use of a HED source has definite advantage over loop sources for broadband frequency measurements with the square waveform from transmitter.

AB - In the controlled source radiomagnetotelluric (CSRMT) sounding method, different types of sources are in common use. However, no systematic examination of their advantages and disadvantages exists. In this paper, we analyze the electromagnetic fields of different CSRMT sources: horizontalelectric dipole, HED, horizontal magnetic dipole, HMD, and vertical magnetic dipole, VMD, using both numerical modelling and field data. Positions of the boundary between the far-field and transition zones have been determined. Using 1D and 2D modelling and results of field experiments, we have shown that the HMD source has the smallest transition zone, while the VMD source hasthe largest one. In general, the HMD and HED sources are preferred for soundings in the far-field zone, due to the versatility of the transmitter’s geometry, and to the possibility of tensor measurements and use of 2D-3D magnetotelluric codes for data interpretation. In the case of the homogeneous half-space, for all sources the boundary between the transition and the far-field zone is farther away from a source for the impedance phase than for theapparent resistivity. Comparison of the signal magnitudes’ decay indicates that the field from the VMD source shows the slowest decrease with distance in the transition zone, while the field from the HMD source shows the fastest decrease, confirming the shorter range of measurements using the latter source. Using field experiments, we have compared the magnitudes of HED-, VMD-, andHMD-signals at odd subharmonics relative to the signal magnitude at the main frequency. We find that use of a HED source has definite advantage over loop sources for broadband frequency measurements with the square waveform from transmitter.

KW - Controlled source radiomagnetotellurics, horizontal electric dipole, horizontal magnetic dipole, vertical magnetic dipole.

KW - Controlled source radiomagnetotellurics

KW - horizontal electric dipole

KW - horizontal magnetic dipole

KW - vertical magnetic dipole

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/18941be1-f4c9-3122-a725-202aa98cdb37/

U2 - 10.1007/s00024-024-03478-0

DO - 10.1007/s00024-024-03478-0

M3 - Article

JO - Pure and Applied Geophysics

JF - Pure and Applied Geophysics

SN - 0033-4553

ER -

ID: 125700078