Standard

On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism. / Lvov, A.A.

In: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , Vol. 33, No. 3, 2017, p. 316-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Lvov, AA 2017, 'On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism', Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 316-325.

APA

Lvov, A. A. (2017). On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология , 33(3), 316-325.

Vancouver

Lvov AA. On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология . 2017;33(3):316-325.

Author

Lvov, A.A. / On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism. In: Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология . 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 316-325.

BibTeX

@article{793a5a0e88e547a89dcb038ece62332c,
title = "On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism",
abstract = "Philosophy of Modernity had considered and laid two fundamental concepts as its basis: subject and method. In the course of history of thought, subject turned into such an epistemological constant, which became able, first, to establish itself, second, to determine truth and to establish its frameworks. This kind of articulation of subject became apt due to the methods Modernity introduced in the scientific paradigm, and Hegel{\textquoteright}s ambitious project played here the greatest part. Thus, the philosophy of history became teleological - it elucidates the events in linear perspective gradually to the preset purpose. A task of the recent philosophical investigations, however, was to search for an alternative methodology beside the subject which could establish another programme of realising will to knowledge. This paper discusses Michel Foucault{\textquoteright}s attempt to oppose the “transversal” philosophy of history to the Modern subjective paradigm in terms of the results he had achieved. Our inquiry becomes possible due to the Foucauldian archaeological method. His original epistemology makes the examination of frameworks of truth of subject as a concept possible. Being formerly a constitutional element, the subject then becomes a methodological problem. Such a consideration of a basic concept in Modern philosophy grants the possibility to study the development and elaboration of the methodological determinism, which supports the development of the pre-Cartesian subject. Concerning the results, we could name, firstly, the reconstruction of the historical retrospective of an element of Modern philosophy{\textquoteright}s apparatus, and, secondly, an attempt to provoke the question on the possibility of freedom beside subject. Refs 15.",
keywords = "teleology, TRANSVERSAL APPROACH, Michel Foucault, historicism, PRACTICES OF THE SELF, AESTHETICS OF EXISTENCE, ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD",
author = "A.A. Lvov",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "316--325",
journal = " Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология ",
issn = "2542-2278",
publisher = "Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Attempt of Possibility Beside the Subject: Michel Foucault and the Attempt of Overcoming of the Teleology of Modern Historicism

AU - Lvov, A.A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Philosophy of Modernity had considered and laid two fundamental concepts as its basis: subject and method. In the course of history of thought, subject turned into such an epistemological constant, which became able, first, to establish itself, second, to determine truth and to establish its frameworks. This kind of articulation of subject became apt due to the methods Modernity introduced in the scientific paradigm, and Hegel’s ambitious project played here the greatest part. Thus, the philosophy of history became teleological - it elucidates the events in linear perspective gradually to the preset purpose. A task of the recent philosophical investigations, however, was to search for an alternative methodology beside the subject which could establish another programme of realising will to knowledge. This paper discusses Michel Foucault’s attempt to oppose the “transversal” philosophy of history to the Modern subjective paradigm in terms of the results he had achieved. Our inquiry becomes possible due to the Foucauldian archaeological method. His original epistemology makes the examination of frameworks of truth of subject as a concept possible. Being formerly a constitutional element, the subject then becomes a methodological problem. Such a consideration of a basic concept in Modern philosophy grants the possibility to study the development and elaboration of the methodological determinism, which supports the development of the pre-Cartesian subject. Concerning the results, we could name, firstly, the reconstruction of the historical retrospective of an element of Modern philosophy’s apparatus, and, secondly, an attempt to provoke the question on the possibility of freedom beside subject. Refs 15.

AB - Philosophy of Modernity had considered and laid two fundamental concepts as its basis: subject and method. In the course of history of thought, subject turned into such an epistemological constant, which became able, first, to establish itself, second, to determine truth and to establish its frameworks. This kind of articulation of subject became apt due to the methods Modernity introduced in the scientific paradigm, and Hegel’s ambitious project played here the greatest part. Thus, the philosophy of history became teleological - it elucidates the events in linear perspective gradually to the preset purpose. A task of the recent philosophical investigations, however, was to search for an alternative methodology beside the subject which could establish another programme of realising will to knowledge. This paper discusses Michel Foucault’s attempt to oppose the “transversal” philosophy of history to the Modern subjective paradigm in terms of the results he had achieved. Our inquiry becomes possible due to the Foucauldian archaeological method. His original epistemology makes the examination of frameworks of truth of subject as a concept possible. Being formerly a constitutional element, the subject then becomes a methodological problem. Such a consideration of a basic concept in Modern philosophy grants the possibility to study the development and elaboration of the methodological determinism, which supports the development of the pre-Cartesian subject. Concerning the results, we could name, firstly, the reconstruction of the historical retrospective of an element of Modern philosophy’s apparatus, and, secondly, an attempt to provoke the question on the possibility of freedom beside subject. Refs 15.

KW - teleology

KW - TRANSVERSAL APPROACH

KW - Michel Foucault

KW - historicism

KW - PRACTICES OF THE SELF

KW - AESTHETICS OF EXISTENCE

KW - ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30250919

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 316

EP - 325

JO - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

JF - Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

SN - 2542-2278

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 28878536