Standard

On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus. / Курдыбайло, Дмитрий Сергеевич.

In: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2019, p. 463-485.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Harvard

Курдыбайло, ДС 2019, 'On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus.', SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 463-485. <http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38689217>

APA

Курдыбайло, Д. С. (2019). On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus. SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ, 13(2), 463-485. http://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38689217

Vancouver

Курдыбайло ДС. On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus. SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ. 2019;13(2):463-485.

Author

Курдыбайло, Дмитрий Сергеевич. / On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus. In: SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 463-485.

BibTeX

@article{9f0b88506f5a44d1b6af8098b533a460,
title = "On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus.",
abstract = "Many recent studies propose that symbolon and synthēma are synonymous in the writings of Proclus. However, his Platonic Theology contains reliable evidence to put this opinion to doubt. The goal of this research is to determine the meaning of both terms from the contexts of their usage, engaging the textual analysis and the following philosophical reconstruction. As distinguished from a symbol, a synthēma has substantial nature, is stable and remains invariable when is discovered at different levels of the ontological hierarchy. In the Platonic Theology, a symbol is often considered in terms of the hierarchic level, where it appears: in the material world, it is corporeal; among numbers, it is ontologically irrelevant, the intelligible realm contains its proper symbols as well. A significant difference between symbolon and synthēma is related to the dialectics of participation: synthēma in an object keeps it on an unparticipated level, while a symbol implies further participation to a symbolic object. Finally",
keywords = "{"}Платоновская теология{"}, myth, neoplatonism, ontology, Platonic Theology, Proclus, symbol, synthēma, Theologia platonica, theurgy, миф, неоплатонизм, онтология, Прокл, символ, синфема, теургия, {"}Платоновская теология{"}, myth, neoplatonism, ontology, Platonic Theology, Proclus, symbol, synthēma, Theologia platonica, theurgy, миф, неоплатонизм, онтология, Прокл, символ, синфема, теургия",
author = "Курдыбайло, {Дмитрий Сергеевич}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "463--485",
journal = "SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ",
issn = "1995-4328",
publisher = "Издательство Новосибирского университета",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On symbolon and synthēma in the Platonic Theology of Proclus.

AU - Курдыбайло, Дмитрий Сергеевич

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Many recent studies propose that symbolon and synthēma are synonymous in the writings of Proclus. However, his Platonic Theology contains reliable evidence to put this opinion to doubt. The goal of this research is to determine the meaning of both terms from the contexts of their usage, engaging the textual analysis and the following philosophical reconstruction. As distinguished from a symbol, a synthēma has substantial nature, is stable and remains invariable when is discovered at different levels of the ontological hierarchy. In the Platonic Theology, a symbol is often considered in terms of the hierarchic level, where it appears: in the material world, it is corporeal; among numbers, it is ontologically irrelevant, the intelligible realm contains its proper symbols as well. A significant difference between symbolon and synthēma is related to the dialectics of participation: synthēma in an object keeps it on an unparticipated level, while a symbol implies further participation to a symbolic object. Finally

AB - Many recent studies propose that symbolon and synthēma are synonymous in the writings of Proclus. However, his Platonic Theology contains reliable evidence to put this opinion to doubt. The goal of this research is to determine the meaning of both terms from the contexts of their usage, engaging the textual analysis and the following philosophical reconstruction. As distinguished from a symbol, a synthēma has substantial nature, is stable and remains invariable when is discovered at different levels of the ontological hierarchy. In the Platonic Theology, a symbol is often considered in terms of the hierarchic level, where it appears: in the material world, it is corporeal; among numbers, it is ontologically irrelevant, the intelligible realm contains its proper symbols as well. A significant difference between symbolon and synthēma is related to the dialectics of participation: synthēma in an object keeps it on an unparticipated level, while a symbol implies further participation to a symbolic object. Finally

KW - "Платоновская теология"

KW - myth

KW - neoplatonism

KW - ontology

KW - Platonic Theology

KW - Proclus

KW - symbol

KW - synthēma

KW - Theologia platonica

KW - theurgy

KW - миф

KW - неоплатонизм

KW - онтология

KW - Прокл

KW - символ

KW - синфема

KW - теургия

KW - "Платоновская теология"

KW - myth

KW - neoplatonism

KW - ontology

KW - Platonic Theology

KW - Proclus

KW - symbol

KW - synthēma

KW - Theologia platonica

KW - theurgy

KW - миф

KW - неоплатонизм

KW - онтология

KW - Прокл

KW - символ

KW - синфема

KW - теургия

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 463

EP - 485

JO - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

JF - SCHOLE. ФИЛОСОФСКОЕ АНТИКОВЕДЕНИЕ И КЛАССИЧЕСКАЯ ТРАДИЦИЯ

SN - 1995-4328

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 78440766