Standard

On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables. / Itsykson, Dmitry; Knop, Alexander; Romashchenko, Andrey; Sokolov, Dmitry.

34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017. ed. / Brigitte Vallee; Heribert Vollmer. Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing, 2017. 43 (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs; Vol. 66).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Itsykson, D, Knop, A, Romashchenko, A & Sokolov, D 2017, On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables. in B Vallee & H Vollmer (eds), 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017., 43, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs, vol. 66, Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing, 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017, Hannover, Germany, 8/03/17. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43

APA

Itsykson, D., Knop, A., Romashchenko, A., & Sokolov, D. (2017). On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables. In B. Vallee, & H. Vollmer (Eds.), 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017 [43] (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs; Vol. 66). Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43

Vancouver

Itsykson D, Knop A, Romashchenko A, Sokolov D. On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables. In Vallee B, Vollmer H, editors, 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017. Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing. 2017. 43. (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43

Author

Itsykson, Dmitry ; Knop, Alexander ; Romashchenko, Andrey ; Sokolov, Dmitry. / On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables. 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017. editor / Brigitte Vallee ; Heribert Vollmer. Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing, 2017. (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{fb23dce2d36d48478039de4f6c710532,
title = "On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables",
abstract = "In 2004 Atserias, Kolaitis and Vardi proposed OBDD-based propositional proof systems that prove unsatisfiability of a CNF formula by deduction of identically false OBDD from OBDDs representing clauses of the initial formula. All OBDDs in such proofs have the same order of variables. We initiate the study of OBDD based proof systems that additionally contain a rule that allows to change the order in OBDDs. At first we consider a proof system OBDD(∧, reordering) that uses the conjunction (join) rule and the rule that allows to change the order. We exponentially separate this proof system from OBDD(∧)-proof system that uses only the conjunction rule. We prove two exponential lower bounds on the size of OBDD(∧,reordering)-refutations of Tseitin formulas and the pigeonhole principle. The first lower bound was previously unknown even for OBDD(∧)-proofs and the second one extends the result of Tveretina et al. from OBDD(∧) to OBDD(∧,reordering). In 2004 Pan and Vardi proposed an approach to the propositional satisfiability problem based on OBDDs and symbolic quantifier elimination (we denote algorithms based on this approach as OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithms). We notice that there exists an OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithm that solves satisfiable and unsatisfiable Tseitin formulas in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that there exist formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that are hard for OBDD(∧, ∃,reordering)-algorithms. Our hard instances are satisfiable formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that correspond to some checksum matrices of error correcting codes.",
keywords = "Error-correcting codes, Expanders, OBDD, Proof complexity, Tseitin formulas",
author = "Dmitry Itsykson and Alexander Knop and Andrey Romashchenko and Dmitry Sokolov",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43",
language = "English",
series = "Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs",
publisher = "Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing",
editor = "Brigitte Vallee and Heribert Vollmer",
booktitle = "34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017",
address = "Germany",
note = "34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017 ; Conference date: 08-03-2017 Through 11-03-2017",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - On OBDD-based algorithms and proof systems that dynamically change order of variables

AU - Itsykson, Dmitry

AU - Knop, Alexander

AU - Romashchenko, Andrey

AU - Sokolov, Dmitry

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - In 2004 Atserias, Kolaitis and Vardi proposed OBDD-based propositional proof systems that prove unsatisfiability of a CNF formula by deduction of identically false OBDD from OBDDs representing clauses of the initial formula. All OBDDs in such proofs have the same order of variables. We initiate the study of OBDD based proof systems that additionally contain a rule that allows to change the order in OBDDs. At first we consider a proof system OBDD(∧, reordering) that uses the conjunction (join) rule and the rule that allows to change the order. We exponentially separate this proof system from OBDD(∧)-proof system that uses only the conjunction rule. We prove two exponential lower bounds on the size of OBDD(∧,reordering)-refutations of Tseitin formulas and the pigeonhole principle. The first lower bound was previously unknown even for OBDD(∧)-proofs and the second one extends the result of Tveretina et al. from OBDD(∧) to OBDD(∧,reordering). In 2004 Pan and Vardi proposed an approach to the propositional satisfiability problem based on OBDDs and symbolic quantifier elimination (we denote algorithms based on this approach as OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithms). We notice that there exists an OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithm that solves satisfiable and unsatisfiable Tseitin formulas in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that there exist formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that are hard for OBDD(∧, ∃,reordering)-algorithms. Our hard instances are satisfiable formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that correspond to some checksum matrices of error correcting codes.

AB - In 2004 Atserias, Kolaitis and Vardi proposed OBDD-based propositional proof systems that prove unsatisfiability of a CNF formula by deduction of identically false OBDD from OBDDs representing clauses of the initial formula. All OBDDs in such proofs have the same order of variables. We initiate the study of OBDD based proof systems that additionally contain a rule that allows to change the order in OBDDs. At first we consider a proof system OBDD(∧, reordering) that uses the conjunction (join) rule and the rule that allows to change the order. We exponentially separate this proof system from OBDD(∧)-proof system that uses only the conjunction rule. We prove two exponential lower bounds on the size of OBDD(∧,reordering)-refutations of Tseitin formulas and the pigeonhole principle. The first lower bound was previously unknown even for OBDD(∧)-proofs and the second one extends the result of Tveretina et al. from OBDD(∧) to OBDD(∧,reordering). In 2004 Pan and Vardi proposed an approach to the propositional satisfiability problem based on OBDDs and symbolic quantifier elimination (we denote algorithms based on this approach as OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithms). We notice that there exists an OBDD(∧,∃)-algorithm that solves satisfiable and unsatisfiable Tseitin formulas in polynomial time. In contrast, we show that there exist formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that are hard for OBDD(∧, ∃,reordering)-algorithms. Our hard instances are satisfiable formulas representing systems of linear equations over F2 that correspond to some checksum matrices of error correcting codes.

KW - Error-correcting codes

KW - Expanders

KW - OBDD

KW - Proof complexity

KW - Tseitin formulas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016185155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43

DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.43

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85016185155

T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs

BT - 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017

A2 - Vallee, Brigitte

A2 - Vollmer, Heribert

PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing

T2 - 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017

Y2 - 8 March 2017 through 11 March 2017

ER -

ID: 49785466