Standard

Note sull’origine delle rubriche di D. 18, 2 (de in diem addictionem) e D. 18, 3 (de lege commissoria). / Tuzov , Daniil .

In: Erga-Logoi, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{6cd523deb90947359330e9ffeaedc275,
title = "Note sull{\textquoteright}origine delle rubriche di D. 18, 2 (de in diem addictionem) e D. 18, 3 (de lege commissoria)",
abstract = "The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian{\textquoteright}s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the sampling, in an attempt to bring the structure of the Digest into line with the material available to them) to disaggregate a {\textquoteleft}complex{\textquoteright} title D. 18, 1, already formed, extracting passages from it to form two new titles, which are the subject of the research.",
keywords = "compilation of Justinian{\textquoteright}s Digest, Justinian{\textquoteright}s Code, Justinian{\textquoteright}s Digest, Roman law",
author = "Daniil Tuzov",
year = "2019",
language = "итальянский",
volume = "7",
journal = "Erga-Logoi",
issn = "2280-9678",
publisher = "LED, Edizioni Universitarie",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Note sull’origine delle rubriche di D. 18, 2 (de in diem addictionem) e D. 18, 3 (de lege commissoria)

AU - Tuzov , Daniil

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian’s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the sampling, in an attempt to bring the structure of the Digest into line with the material available to them) to disaggregate a ‘complex’ title D. 18, 1, already formed, extracting passages from it to form two new titles, which are the subject of the research.

AB - The article analyses the origin of two rubrics of Justinian’s Digest: De in diem addictionem (D. 18, 2) and De lege commissoria (D. 18, 3). A hypothesis on the creation of these rubrics and relative titles is envisaged: the Digest compilers would have decided (probably in the final phase of the sampling, in an attempt to bring the structure of the Digest into line with the material available to them) to disaggregate a ‘complex’ title D. 18, 1, already formed, extracting passages from it to form two new titles, which are the subject of the research.

KW - compilation of Justinian’s Digest

KW - Justinian’s Code

KW - Justinian’s Digest

KW - Roman law

UR - https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Erga-Logoi/article/view/1597

M3 - статья

VL - 7

JO - Erga-Logoi

JF - Erga-Logoi

SN - 2280-9678

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 36274570