Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Neural mechanisms of cognitive dissonance (Revised) : An EEG study. / Colosio, Marco; Shestakova, Anna; Nikulin, Vadim V.; Blagovechtchenski, Evgeny; Klucharev, Vasily.
In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 37, No. 20, 17.05.2017, p. 5074-5083.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural mechanisms of cognitive dissonance (Revised)
T2 - An EEG study
AU - Colosio, Marco
AU - Shestakova, Anna
AU - Nikulin, Vadim V.
AU - Blagovechtchenski, Evgeny
AU - Klucharev, Vasily
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Colosio et al.
PY - 2017/5/17
Y1 - 2017/5/17
N2 - Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that our preferences are modulated by the mere act of choosing. A choice between two similarly valued alternatives creates psychological tension (cognitive dissonance) that is reduced by a postdecisional reevaluation of the alternatives. We measured EEG of human subjects during rest and free-choice paradigm. Our study demonstrates that choices associated with stronger cognitive dissonance trigger a larger negative frontocentral evoked response similar to error-related negativity, which has in turn been implicated in general performance monitoring. Furthermore, the amplitude of the evoked response is correlated with the reevaluation of the alternatives. We also found a link between individual neural dynamics (long-range temporal correlations) of the frontocentral cortices during rest and follow-up neural and behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. Individuals with stronger restingstate long-range temporal correlations demonstrated a greater postdecisional reevaluation of the alternatives and larger evoked brain responses associated with stronger cognitive dissonance. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive dissonance is reflected in both restingstate and choice-related activity of the prefrontal cortex as part of the general performance-monitoring circuitry.
AB - Cognitive dissonance theory suggests that our preferences are modulated by the mere act of choosing. A choice between two similarly valued alternatives creates psychological tension (cognitive dissonance) that is reduced by a postdecisional reevaluation of the alternatives. We measured EEG of human subjects during rest and free-choice paradigm. Our study demonstrates that choices associated with stronger cognitive dissonance trigger a larger negative frontocentral evoked response similar to error-related negativity, which has in turn been implicated in general performance monitoring. Furthermore, the amplitude of the evoked response is correlated with the reevaluation of the alternatives. We also found a link between individual neural dynamics (long-range temporal correlations) of the frontocentral cortices during rest and follow-up neural and behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. Individuals with stronger restingstate long-range temporal correlations demonstrated a greater postdecisional reevaluation of the alternatives and larger evoked brain responses associated with stronger cognitive dissonance. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive dissonance is reflected in both restingstate and choice-related activity of the prefrontal cortex as part of the general performance-monitoring circuitry.
KW - Cognitive dissonance
KW - Error-related negativity
KW - Long-range temporal correlation
KW - Resting state
KW - Spread of alternatives
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019878189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-16.2017
DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-16.2017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28438968
AN - SCOPUS:85019878189
VL - 37
SP - 5074
EP - 5083
JO - Journal of Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Neuroscience
SN - 0270-6474
IS - 20
ER -
ID: 95022988