Standard

Microbiomes of different ages in rendzic leptosols in the crimean peninsula. / Kimeklis, Anastasiia K.; Gladkov, Grigory V.; Zverev, Aleksei O.; Kichko, Arina A.; Andronov, Evgeny E.; Ergina, Elena I.; Kostenko, Igor V.; Abakumov, Evgeny V.

In: PeerJ, Vol. 9, 10871, 18.02.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Kimeklis, A. K., Gladkov, G. V., Zverev, A. O., Kichko, A. A., Andronov, E. E., Ergina, E. I., Kostenko, I. V., & Abakumov, E. V. (2021). Microbiomes of different ages in rendzic leptosols in the crimean peninsula. PeerJ, 9, [10871]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10871

Vancouver

Author

Kimeklis, Anastasiia K. ; Gladkov, Grigory V. ; Zverev, Aleksei O. ; Kichko, Arina A. ; Andronov, Evgeny E. ; Ergina, Elena I. ; Kostenko, Igor V. ; Abakumov, Evgeny V. / Microbiomes of different ages in rendzic leptosols in the crimean peninsula. In: PeerJ. 2021 ; Vol. 9.

BibTeX

@article{8af3ee6ca20841d3bab917e592609cd9,
title = "Microbiomes of different ages in rendzic leptosols in the crimean peninsula",
abstract = "Rendzic Leptosols are intrazonal soils formed on limestone bedrock. The specialty of these soils is that parent rock material is more influential in shaping soil characteristics than zonal factors such as climate, especially during soil formation. Unlike fast evolving Podzols due to their leaching regime, Leptosols do not undergo rapid development due to the nature of the limestone. Little is known how microbiome reflects this process, so we assessed microbiome composition of Rendzic Leptosols of different ages, arising from disruption and subsequent reclamation. The mountains and foothills that cover much of the Crimean Peninsula are ideal for this type of study, as the soils were formed on limestone and have been subjected to anthropogenic impacts through much of human history. Microbiomes of four soil sites forming a chronosequence, including different soil horizons, were studied using sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries and quantitative PCR. Dominant phyla for all soil sites were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thaumarchaeota, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes. Alpha diversity was similar across sites and tended to be higher in topsoil. Beta diversity showed that microbiomes diverged according to the soil site and the soil horizon. The oldest and the youngest soils had the most similar microbiomes, which could have been caused by their geographic proximity. Oligotrophic bacteria from Chitinophagaceae, Blastocatellaceae and Rubrobacteriaceae dominated the microbiome of these soils. The microbiome of 700-year old soil was the most diverse. This soil was from the only study location with topsoil formed by plant litter, which provided additional nutrients and could have been the driving force of this differentiation. Consistent with this assumption, this soil was abundant in copiotrophic bacteria from Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla. The microbiome of 50-year old Leptosol was more similar to the microbiome of benchmark soil than the microbiome of 700-year old soil, especially by weighted metrics. CCA analysis, in combination with PERMANOVA, linked differences in microbiomes to the joint change of all soil chemical parameters between soil horizons. Local factors, such as parent material and plant litter, more strongly influenced the microbiome composition in Rendzic Leptosols than soil age. ",
keywords = "16S rRNA library sequencing, Chronosequence, Pedogenesis, Rendzic Leptosol, Soil liming, Soil microbiome, AGRICULTURAL SOIL, RIBOSOMAL-RNA, ORGANIZATION, BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES, SOIL BACTERIAL, AREAS, PLANT-GROWTH",
author = "Kimeklis, {Anastasiia K.} and Gladkov, {Grigory V.} and Zverev, {Aleksei O.} and Kichko, {Arina A.} and Andronov, {Evgeny E.} and Ergina, {Elena I.} and Kostenko, {Igor V.} and Abakumov, {Evgeny V.}",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the grant of the Russian Scientific Foundation, project 17-16-01030. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Kimeklis et al. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = feb,
day = "18",
doi = "10.7717/peerj.10871",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PeerJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PeerJ",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microbiomes of different ages in rendzic leptosols in the crimean peninsula

AU - Kimeklis, Anastasiia K.

AU - Gladkov, Grigory V.

AU - Zverev, Aleksei O.

AU - Kichko, Arina A.

AU - Andronov, Evgeny E.

AU - Ergina, Elena I.

AU - Kostenko, Igor V.

AU - Abakumov, Evgeny V.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the grant of the Russian Scientific Foundation, project 17-16-01030. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Kimeklis et al. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/2/18

Y1 - 2021/2/18

N2 - Rendzic Leptosols are intrazonal soils formed on limestone bedrock. The specialty of these soils is that parent rock material is more influential in shaping soil characteristics than zonal factors such as climate, especially during soil formation. Unlike fast evolving Podzols due to their leaching regime, Leptosols do not undergo rapid development due to the nature of the limestone. Little is known how microbiome reflects this process, so we assessed microbiome composition of Rendzic Leptosols of different ages, arising from disruption and subsequent reclamation. The mountains and foothills that cover much of the Crimean Peninsula are ideal for this type of study, as the soils were formed on limestone and have been subjected to anthropogenic impacts through much of human history. Microbiomes of four soil sites forming a chronosequence, including different soil horizons, were studied using sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries and quantitative PCR. Dominant phyla for all soil sites were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thaumarchaeota, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes. Alpha diversity was similar across sites and tended to be higher in topsoil. Beta diversity showed that microbiomes diverged according to the soil site and the soil horizon. The oldest and the youngest soils had the most similar microbiomes, which could have been caused by their geographic proximity. Oligotrophic bacteria from Chitinophagaceae, Blastocatellaceae and Rubrobacteriaceae dominated the microbiome of these soils. The microbiome of 700-year old soil was the most diverse. This soil was from the only study location with topsoil formed by plant litter, which provided additional nutrients and could have been the driving force of this differentiation. Consistent with this assumption, this soil was abundant in copiotrophic bacteria from Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla. The microbiome of 50-year old Leptosol was more similar to the microbiome of benchmark soil than the microbiome of 700-year old soil, especially by weighted metrics. CCA analysis, in combination with PERMANOVA, linked differences in microbiomes to the joint change of all soil chemical parameters between soil horizons. Local factors, such as parent material and plant litter, more strongly influenced the microbiome composition in Rendzic Leptosols than soil age.

AB - Rendzic Leptosols are intrazonal soils formed on limestone bedrock. The specialty of these soils is that parent rock material is more influential in shaping soil characteristics than zonal factors such as climate, especially during soil formation. Unlike fast evolving Podzols due to their leaching regime, Leptosols do not undergo rapid development due to the nature of the limestone. Little is known how microbiome reflects this process, so we assessed microbiome composition of Rendzic Leptosols of different ages, arising from disruption and subsequent reclamation. The mountains and foothills that cover much of the Crimean Peninsula are ideal for this type of study, as the soils were formed on limestone and have been subjected to anthropogenic impacts through much of human history. Microbiomes of four soil sites forming a chronosequence, including different soil horizons, were studied using sequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries and quantitative PCR. Dominant phyla for all soil sites were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thaumarchaeota, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia and Firmicutes. Alpha diversity was similar across sites and tended to be higher in topsoil. Beta diversity showed that microbiomes diverged according to the soil site and the soil horizon. The oldest and the youngest soils had the most similar microbiomes, which could have been caused by their geographic proximity. Oligotrophic bacteria from Chitinophagaceae, Blastocatellaceae and Rubrobacteriaceae dominated the microbiome of these soils. The microbiome of 700-year old soil was the most diverse. This soil was from the only study location with topsoil formed by plant litter, which provided additional nutrients and could have been the driving force of this differentiation. Consistent with this assumption, this soil was abundant in copiotrophic bacteria from Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla. The microbiome of 50-year old Leptosol was more similar to the microbiome of benchmark soil than the microbiome of 700-year old soil, especially by weighted metrics. CCA analysis, in combination with PERMANOVA, linked differences in microbiomes to the joint change of all soil chemical parameters between soil horizons. Local factors, such as parent material and plant litter, more strongly influenced the microbiome composition in Rendzic Leptosols than soil age.

KW - 16S rRNA library sequencing

KW - Chronosequence

KW - Pedogenesis

KW - Rendzic Leptosol

KW - Soil liming

KW - Soil microbiome

KW - AGRICULTURAL SOIL

KW - RIBOSOMAL-RNA

KW - ORGANIZATION

KW - BACTERIAL COMMUNITIES

KW - SOIL BACTERIAL

KW - AREAS

KW - PLANT-GROWTH

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101229486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7717/peerj.10871

DO - 10.7717/peerj.10871

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85101229486

VL - 9

JO - PeerJ

JF - PeerJ

SN - 2167-8359

M1 - 10871

ER -

ID: 74582881