TY - JOUR

T1 - Logic of L’état Moderne

AU - Fyodorov, S.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Ltd "Integration: Education and Science". All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/10/31

Y1 - 2020/10/31

N2 - Since the 1980s the concept of “Etat ʹ Modernе” (Modern State) gained more and more ground in the Western historiography, and conventional statist concepts came in for severe criticism. The debate centered around not only general approaches concerning continuity of political processes from Antiquity to Modern times, but also around more specific issues, which, nevertheless, required serious reconsideration. The author concentrates on some ways (logics) which contributors to both État Moderne and the Modern State projects had developed in last decades of the 20th and in the beginning of 21th centuries. Nevertheless remained within the limits of the earlier theories and assumptions (theleogically orientated state and state-centered research), they rarely questioned the traditional top-down model and did not recognize the importance of local (almost corporate) and individual initiatives for statebuilding from the Late Middle Ages to the 19th century as well as denied the fact that the latter were part of developing political systems since the emergence of the representative institutions.

AB - Since the 1980s the concept of “Etat ʹ Modernе” (Modern State) gained more and more ground in the Western historiography, and conventional statist concepts came in for severe criticism. The debate centered around not only general approaches concerning continuity of political processes from Antiquity to Modern times, but also around more specific issues, which, nevertheless, required serious reconsideration. The author concentrates on some ways (logics) which contributors to both État Moderne and the Modern State projects had developed in last decades of the 20th and in the beginning of 21th centuries. Nevertheless remained within the limits of the earlier theories and assumptions (theleogically orientated state and state-centered research), they rarely questioned the traditional top-down model and did not recognize the importance of local (almost corporate) and individual initiatives for statebuilding from the Late Middle Ages to the 19th century as well as denied the fact that the latter were part of developing political systems since the emergence of the representative institutions.

KW - Западная Европа XIV—XVIII вв.

KW - государственное строительство

KW - «новое государство»

KW - List (en): Western Europe of the 14th — 18th Centuries

KW - State building

KW - Western historiography

KW - “modern state”

KW - state building

KW - western historiography

KW - "modern state"

KW - 18th Centuries

KW - Western Europe of the 14th

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096753937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/273a743c-ff38-38df-bdb9-f3243dca7757/

U2 - 10.18254/S207987840011668-3

DO - 10.18254/S207987840011668-3

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85096753937

VL - 11

JO - ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ

JF - ЭЛЕКТРОННЫЙ НАУЧНО-ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ИСТОРИЯ

SN - 2079-8784

IS - 10

ER -