Standard

Logic lessons for Russia : Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment. / Brodsky, Alexander.

In: Rivista di Estetica, Vol. 67, No. 67, 01.04.2018, p. 20-32.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Harvard

Brodsky, A 2018, 'Logic lessons for Russia: Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment', Rivista di Estetica, vol. 67, no. 67, pp. 20-32. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2525

APA

Brodsky, A. (2018). Logic lessons for Russia: Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment. Rivista di Estetica, 67(67), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2525

Vancouver

Brodsky A. Logic lessons for Russia: Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment. Rivista di Estetica. 2018 Apr 1;67(67):20-32. https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.2525

Author

Brodsky, Alexander. / Logic lessons for Russia : Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment. In: Rivista di Estetica. 2018 ; Vol. 67, No. 67. pp. 20-32.

BibTeX

@article{98200a063b774ce5821919e0b598357b,
title = "Logic lessons for Russia: Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment",
abstract = "The paper argues that the philosophy that was taught in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in late 16th-early 17th century and then became the ideological basis for the Moscow {"}Latinism{"} can be attributed to so-called Second scholasticism. The main features of Second scholasticism are the rejection of predestination in theology, usage of probabilistic approaches in logic and ethics and confrontation with absolutism in politics. These features made Second scholasticism unacceptable for absolute monarchies emerging in Europe (including the Russian Empire) which utilized universal rationalism of the early Enlightenment as an ideological basis. Both in Western Europe and in Russia Second scholasticism became {"}a zone of cultural exclusion{"}. However prevalence of Second scholasticism in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth concurred with making up of the Ukrainian cultural originality and in many respects defined characteristic features of the Ukrainian mentality.",
author = "Alexander Brodsky",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4000/estetica.2525",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "20--32",
journal = "Rivista di Estetica",
issn = "0035-6212",
publisher = "ROSENBERG & SELLIER",
number = "67",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Logic lessons for Russia

T2 - Kiev's theology and the Russian Enlightenment

AU - Brodsky, Alexander

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - The paper argues that the philosophy that was taught in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in late 16th-early 17th century and then became the ideological basis for the Moscow "Latinism" can be attributed to so-called Second scholasticism. The main features of Second scholasticism are the rejection of predestination in theology, usage of probabilistic approaches in logic and ethics and confrontation with absolutism in politics. These features made Second scholasticism unacceptable for absolute monarchies emerging in Europe (including the Russian Empire) which utilized universal rationalism of the early Enlightenment as an ideological basis. Both in Western Europe and in Russia Second scholasticism became "a zone of cultural exclusion". However prevalence of Second scholasticism in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth concurred with making up of the Ukrainian cultural originality and in many respects defined characteristic features of the Ukrainian mentality.

AB - The paper argues that the philosophy that was taught in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in late 16th-early 17th century and then became the ideological basis for the Moscow "Latinism" can be attributed to so-called Second scholasticism. The main features of Second scholasticism are the rejection of predestination in theology, usage of probabilistic approaches in logic and ethics and confrontation with absolutism in politics. These features made Second scholasticism unacceptable for absolute monarchies emerging in Europe (including the Russian Empire) which utilized universal rationalism of the early Enlightenment as an ideological basis. Both in Western Europe and in Russia Second scholasticism became "a zone of cultural exclusion". However prevalence of Second scholasticism in Orthodox schools of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth concurred with making up of the Ukrainian cultural originality and in many respects defined characteristic features of the Ukrainian mentality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049694968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4000/estetica.2525

DO - 10.4000/estetica.2525

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85049694968

VL - 67

SP - 20

EP - 32

JO - Rivista di Estetica

JF - Rivista di Estetica

SN - 0035-6212

IS - 67

ER -

ID: 33237333