Standard

International optimism : Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries. / Members of the International Situations Project    ; Baranski, Erica; Sweeny, Kate; Gardiner, Gwendolyn; Funder, David C.; Львова, Ольга Владимировна.

In: Journal of Personality, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Members of the International Situations Project    , Baranski, E, Sweeny, K, Gardiner, G, Funder, DC & Львова, ОВ 2020, 'International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries', Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12582

APA

Members of the International Situations Project    , Baranski, E., Sweeny, K., Gardiner, G., Funder, D. C., & Львова, О. В. (Accepted/In press). International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12582

Vancouver

Members of the International Situations Project    , Baranski E, Sweeny K, Gardiner G, Funder DC, Львова ОВ. International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries. Journal of Personality. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12582

Author

Members of the International Situations Project    ; Baranski, Erica ; Sweeny, Kate ; Gardiner, Gwendolyn ; Funder, David C. ; Львова, Ольга Владимировна. / International optimism : Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries. In: Journal of Personality. 2020.

BibTeX

@article{7fd33c932d824522afe0be3c035b2aa4,
title = "International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries",
abstract = "Objective: The current exploratory study sought to examine dispositional optimism, or the general expectation for positive outcomes, around the world. Method: Dispositional optimism and possible correlates were assessed across 61 countries (N = 15,185; mean age = 21.92; 77% female). Mean-level differences in optimism were computed along with their relationships with individual and country-level variables. Results: Worldwide, mean optimism levels were above the midpoint of the scale. Perhaps surprisingly, country-level optimism was negatively related to gross domestic product per capita, population density, and democratic norms and positively related to income inequality and perceived corruption. However, country-level optimism was positively related to projected economic improvement. Individual-level optimism was positively related to individual well-being within every country, although this relationship was less strong in countries with challenging economic and social circumstances. Conclusions: While individuals around the world are generally optimistic, societal characteristics appear to affect the degree to which their optimism is associated with psychological well-being, sometimes in seemingly anomalous ways.",
keywords = "cross-cultural, dispositional optimism, well-being",
author = "{Members of the International Situations Project   } and Erica Baranski and Kate Sweeny and Gwendolyn Gardiner and Funder, {David C.} and Львова, {Ольга Владимировна} and Погребицкая, {Виктория Евгеньевна} and Аллахвердов, {Михаил Викторович} and Маничев, {Сергей Алексеевич}",
note = "Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The Center for Open Science built and hosted the multi‐lingual data‐gathering web site. The research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant BCS‐1528131. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the individual researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Data gathering in the Czech Republic were supported by grant 17‐14387S by the Czech Science Foundation and by institutional research funding RVO: 68081740 from the Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Data gathering in Chile were partly supported by the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (FONDAP 15130009) and Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (CIIR) (FONDAP 15110006). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/jopy.12582",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - International optimism

T2 - Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries

AU - Members of the International Situations Project   

AU - Baranski, Erica

AU - Sweeny, Kate

AU - Gardiner, Gwendolyn

AU - Funder, David C.

AU - Львова, Ольга Владимировна

AU - Погребицкая, Виктория Евгеньевна

AU - Аллахвердов, Михаил Викторович

AU - Маничев, Сергей Алексеевич

N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The Center for Open Science built and hosted the multi‐lingual data‐gathering web site. The research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant BCS‐1528131. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the individual researchers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Data gathering in the Czech Republic were supported by grant 17‐14387S by the Czech Science Foundation and by institutional research funding RVO: 68081740 from the Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences. Data gathering in Chile were partly supported by the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (FONDAP 15130009) and Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (CIIR) (FONDAP 15110006). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objective: The current exploratory study sought to examine dispositional optimism, or the general expectation for positive outcomes, around the world. Method: Dispositional optimism and possible correlates were assessed across 61 countries (N = 15,185; mean age = 21.92; 77% female). Mean-level differences in optimism were computed along with their relationships with individual and country-level variables. Results: Worldwide, mean optimism levels were above the midpoint of the scale. Perhaps surprisingly, country-level optimism was negatively related to gross domestic product per capita, population density, and democratic norms and positively related to income inequality and perceived corruption. However, country-level optimism was positively related to projected economic improvement. Individual-level optimism was positively related to individual well-being within every country, although this relationship was less strong in countries with challenging economic and social circumstances. Conclusions: While individuals around the world are generally optimistic, societal characteristics appear to affect the degree to which their optimism is associated with psychological well-being, sometimes in seemingly anomalous ways.

AB - Objective: The current exploratory study sought to examine dispositional optimism, or the general expectation for positive outcomes, around the world. Method: Dispositional optimism and possible correlates were assessed across 61 countries (N = 15,185; mean age = 21.92; 77% female). Mean-level differences in optimism were computed along with their relationships with individual and country-level variables. Results: Worldwide, mean optimism levels were above the midpoint of the scale. Perhaps surprisingly, country-level optimism was negatively related to gross domestic product per capita, population density, and democratic norms and positively related to income inequality and perceived corruption. However, country-level optimism was positively related to projected economic improvement. Individual-level optimism was positively related to individual well-being within every country, although this relationship was less strong in countries with challenging economic and social circumstances. Conclusions: While individuals around the world are generally optimistic, societal characteristics appear to affect the degree to which their optimism is associated with psychological well-being, sometimes in seemingly anomalous ways.

KW - cross-cultural

KW - dispositional optimism

KW - well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089990352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12582

DO - 10.1111/jopy.12582

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85089990352

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

ER -

ID: 75056886