Documents

I interpret the metric inscription on the stylus from the Bloomberg excavations in
London (Tomlin 2018) as a polymetron that consists of two iambic senarii and an elegiac distich. In acul[eat]um, if this restoration is correct, -ea- must be scanned monosyllabically with synizesis. In lines 2–3 I punctuate before ut and
after rogo, so that the ut clause depends on rogo.
In line 4 I restore ut[i], which provides a hexameter: si fortuna daret quo possem largius uti! (si introduces a wish, like utinam). In the word that follows via the third letter must be identified as N (not as V); I suggest to restore either cen[a] (the ablative that is asyndetically coordinated with via) or Cen[i] (the vocative of Cenius). In either case via must be scanned monosyllabically with
synizesis.
Translated title of the contributionНадпись на римском стилосе из Лондона
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-350
Number of pages11
JournalHyperboreus
Volume25
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2019

    Scopus subject areas

  • Classics
  • History

ID: 50850376