Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
Influencers on the Russian Twitter : Institutions vs. people in the discussion on migrants. / Bodrunova, Svetlana S.; Litvinenko, Anna A.; Blekanov, Ivan S.
EGOSE 2016 - International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. p. 212-222 (ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 22-23-November-2016).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Influencers on the Russian Twitter
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, EGOSE 2016
AU - Bodrunova, Svetlana S.
AU - Litvinenko, Anna A.
AU - Blekanov, Ivan S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 ACM.
PY - 2016/11/22
Y1 - 2016/11/22
N2 - With the emergence of discussion platforms like Twitter, the hopes rose that computer-mediated public sphere would become more even in access to discussion than mass-mediatized public sphere of the late 20th century. Scholars have argued that it will eventually form an 'opinion crossroads' where conflicts would be discussed by all the parties involved. But today, existing research provides mixed evidence on whether ordinary users, rather than mainstream media and institutional actors, can become influencers in discussions on current issues, e.g. relations between host and migrant communities. We focus on the Twitter discussion about an inter-ethnic conflict in Moscow's Biryuliovo district in 2013 and aim at defining who were its real influencers by reconstructing the discussion's web graph, as well as analyzing and juxtaposing its metrics to figures indicating user activity. Our results show that, despite hyperactivity of media accounts, they were largely absent as deliberative influencers, but the place of influencers was occupied by politicized (nationalist and liberal) accounts, rather by eyewitness reporters or public figures.
AB - With the emergence of discussion platforms like Twitter, the hopes rose that computer-mediated public sphere would become more even in access to discussion than mass-mediatized public sphere of the late 20th century. Scholars have argued that it will eventually form an 'opinion crossroads' where conflicts would be discussed by all the parties involved. But today, existing research provides mixed evidence on whether ordinary users, rather than mainstream media and institutional actors, can become influencers in discussions on current issues, e.g. relations between host and migrant communities. We focus on the Twitter discussion about an inter-ethnic conflict in Moscow's Biryuliovo district in 2013 and aim at defining who were its real influencers by reconstructing the discussion's web graph, as well as analyzing and juxtaposing its metrics to figures indicating user activity. Our results show that, despite hyperactivity of media accounts, they were largely absent as deliberative influencers, but the place of influencers was occupied by politicized (nationalist and liberal) accounts, rather by eyewitness reporters or public figures.
KW - Influencer
KW - Inter-ethnic conflict
KW - Twitter
KW - Web graph
KW - Webcrawling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008177608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3014087.3014106
DO - 10.1145/3014087.3014106
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 212
EP - 222
BT - EGOSE 2016 - International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
Y2 - 21 November 2016 through 22 November 2016
ER -
ID: 7648340