The crystal structure of 45 tourmalines containing trivalent cations (Me3+: Cr3+, V3+, Fe3+) and 43 tourmalines containing divalent cations (Me2+: Fe2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+) of 3d elements were analysed. We establish that the incorporation of Me3+ cations is controlled by the ratio between the sizes of YO6 and ZO(6) octahedra and does not exceed eight atoms per formula unit (apfu), while the incorporation of Me2+ cations is controlled by the charge balance and does not exceed 3 apfu. We prove that there are no structural constraints controlling the incorporation of Co, Ni and Cu cations into the tourmaline structure at concentrations of up to 1 apfu. We show that, when the limiting content (less or equal to 1 apfu and 1.6 apfu for divalent and trivalent cations, respectively) is reached, these cations start to occupy not only YO6, but also ZO(6) octahedra, to maintain stability of the crystal structure. As the content of 3d-element cations increases further, the degree of disorder grows and, at a content of similar to 7 apfu, their distribution is close to statistical. An increase in the content of 3d cations, accompanied by their disordering, causes a decrease in disparity between sizes of YO6 and ZO(6) octahedra and their deformations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-928
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Mineralogy
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2018

    Research areas

  • tourmaline, structural adjustment, crystal structure refinement, crystal chemistry, 3d elements, SCHORL-DRAVITE SERIES, MN2+ SITE OCCUPANCY, CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE, BEARING TOURMALINES, MN2+-RICH TOURMALINE, NICKELOAN TOURMALINE, CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION, RICH TOURMALINE, SOLID-SOLUTIONS, GOLD DEPOSIT

ID: 36107895