Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Ideas, ideologies and public consent: Introducing the issue . / Gutorov, Vladimir A. ; Shirinyants, Alexander A. ; Kazarinova, Daria B. .
In: ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2023, p. 9-20.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ideas, ideologies and public consent:
T2 - Introducing the issue
AU - Gutorov, Vladimir A.
AU - Shirinyants, Alexander A.
AU - Kazarinova, Daria B.
N1 - Gutorov V.A., Shirinyants A.A., Kazainova D.B. Ideas, ideologies and public consent: Introducing the issue // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 2023. Т. 25. № 1. С. 9–20. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-1-9-20
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The concept of consent is essential for every society society, affecting almost allits spheres — from everyday life to socio-political bases. Therefore, it cannot be considered accidental that both the idea itself and the diverse directions of its interpretation, dating back to the era of early modernity, today constitute one of the most priorities, intellectually saturated segments in modern socio-political theory. It is impossible to deny the appeal of the doctrine of personal consent (and the parallel thesis that no government is legitimate unless it acts without the consent of the governed). It has had a great influence on the political institutions of many modern states and has been a major factor in the direction that political theory has taken since 1600. In the second half of the 20th century, two approaches prevailed in political theory, within the framework of which the process of formation of theconsensus tradition: personal and historical ones. The most impact to the theory is made by criticism of the unilinear model of consent analysis in the works of George Klosko, analysis by R.D. Bernstein of the problem of consent in the form of critical remarks on the philosophical position of R. Rorty, the concept of socialist “consent strategy” developed in the 1980s by E. Laclau and Sh. Mouffe, the controversy of the Canadian political philosopher James Tully with neo-Marxist theorists, the philosophical interpretation of consent by Jürgen Habermas as part of his analysis of the “rationalization paradox” etc.This theoretical and methodological frame becomes a basis for the thematic volume, where the articles on the history of socio-political thought are followed by the chapter devoted to the problems of Russia between cleavages and social harmony. Russian problems are blended with an international context, and the issue ends with an attempt to understand the ideological attitudes of modern youth.
AB - The concept of consent is essential for every society society, affecting almost allits spheres — from everyday life to socio-political bases. Therefore, it cannot be considered accidental that both the idea itself and the diverse directions of its interpretation, dating back to the era of early modernity, today constitute one of the most priorities, intellectually saturated segments in modern socio-political theory. It is impossible to deny the appeal of the doctrine of personal consent (and the parallel thesis that no government is legitimate unless it acts without the consent of the governed). It has had a great influence on the political institutions of many modern states and has been a major factor in the direction that political theory has taken since 1600. In the second half of the 20th century, two approaches prevailed in political theory, within the framework of which the process of formation of theconsensus tradition: personal and historical ones. The most impact to the theory is made by criticism of the unilinear model of consent analysis in the works of George Klosko, analysis by R.D. Bernstein of the problem of consent in the form of critical remarks on the philosophical position of R. Rorty, the concept of socialist “consent strategy” developed in the 1980s by E. Laclau and Sh. Mouffe, the controversy of the Canadian political philosopher James Tully with neo-Marxist theorists, the philosophical interpretation of consent by Jürgen Habermas as part of his analysis of the “rationalization paradox” etc.This theoretical and methodological frame becomes a basis for the thematic volume, where the articles on the history of socio-political thought are followed by the chapter devoted to the problems of Russia between cleavages and social harmony. Russian problems are blended with an international context, and the issue ends with an attempt to understand the ideological attitudes of modern youth.
KW - political idea, ideology, consent, political obligation, fairness, natural duties, common good, justice, consensus, rationalization, academic school
KW - political idea
KW - ideology
KW - Consent
KW - political obligation
KW - Fairness
KW - natural duties
KW - common good
KW - justice
KW - consensus
KW - rationalization
KW - academic school
M3 - Article
VL - 25
SP - 9
EP - 20
JO - ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ
JF - ВЕСТНИК РОССИЙСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ДРУЖБЫ НАРОДОВ. СЕРИЯ: ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ
SN - 2313-1438
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 103988046