How to publish a nice paper and reject a bad paper. Reviewer's comments

Standard

How to publish a nice paper and reject a bad paper. Reviewer's comments. / Fradkov, A. L.

In: Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, No. 10, 2003, p. 149-157.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{6101ab68e2864164b291c27f6ac050be,

title = "How to publish a nice paper and reject a bad paper. Reviewer's comments",

abstract = "It is noted that the reviewing process is a very important part of scientific activity. It's very difficult to separate advices to an author and a reviewer. In the paper, the data and examples relating to automation and control processes are presented.",

author = "Fradkov, {A. L.}",

year = "2003",

language = "русский",

pages = "149--157",

journal = "АВТОМАТИКА И ТЕЛЕМЕХАНИКА",

issn = "0005-2310",

publisher = "Издательство {"}Наука{"}",

number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to publish a nice paper and reject a bad paper. Reviewer's comments

AU - Fradkov, A. L.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - It is noted that the reviewing process is a very important part of scientific activity. It's very difficult to separate advices to an author and a reviewer. In the paper, the data and examples relating to automation and control processes are presented.

AB - It is noted that the reviewing process is a very important part of scientific activity. It's very difficult to separate advices to an author and a reviewer. In the paper, the data and examples relating to automation and control processes are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242412526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - статья

AN - SCOPUS:0242412526

SP - 149

EP - 157

JO - АВТОМАТИКА И ТЕЛЕМЕХАНИКА

JF - АВТОМАТИКА И ТЕЛЕМЕХАНИКА

SN - 0005-2310

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 88357623