Standard

Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts : 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010. / Sinnhuber, M.; Nesse Tyssoy, H.; Asikainen, T.; Bender, S.; Funke, B.; Hendrickx, K.; Pettit, J. M.; Reddmann, T.; Rozanov, E.; Schmidt, H.; Smith-Johnsen, C.; Sukhodolov, T.; Szelag, M. E.; van de Kamp, M.; Verronen, P. T.; Wissing, J. M.; Yakovchuk, O. S.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 127, No. 1, e2021JA029466, 01.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Sinnhuber, M, Nesse Tyssoy, H, Asikainen, T, Bender, S, Funke, B, Hendrickx, K, Pettit, JM, Reddmann, T, Rozanov, E, Schmidt, H, Smith-Johnsen, C, Sukhodolov, T, Szelag, ME, van de Kamp, M, Verronen, PT, Wissing, JM & Yakovchuk, OS 2022, 'Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts: 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010', Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 127, no. 1, e2021JA029466. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029466

APA

Sinnhuber, M., Nesse Tyssoy, H., Asikainen, T., Bender, S., Funke, B., Hendrickx, K., Pettit, J. M., Reddmann, T., Rozanov, E., Schmidt, H., Smith-Johnsen, C., Sukhodolov, T., Szelag, M. E., van de Kamp, M., Verronen, P. T., Wissing, J. M., & Yakovchuk, O. S. (2022). Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts: 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 127(1), [e2021JA029466]. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029466

Vancouver

Sinnhuber M, Nesse Tyssoy H, Asikainen T, Bender S, Funke B, Hendrickx K et al. Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts: 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2022 Jan;127(1). e2021JA029466. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029466

Author

Sinnhuber, M. ; Nesse Tyssoy, H. ; Asikainen, T. ; Bender, S. ; Funke, B. ; Hendrickx, K. ; Pettit, J. M. ; Reddmann, T. ; Rozanov, E. ; Schmidt, H. ; Smith-Johnsen, C. ; Sukhodolov, T. ; Szelag, M. E. ; van de Kamp, M. ; Verronen, P. T. ; Wissing, J. M. ; Yakovchuk, O. S. / Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts : 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 2022 ; Vol. 127, No. 1.

BibTeX

@article{c33fd501a9e64218bcae0d05857121f3,
title = "Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts: 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010",
abstract = "Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered to play an important part in the natural forcing of the middle atmosphere with a possible impact on the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistry-climate models. The HEPPA III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. In this study, we apply electron ionization rates from three data-sets in four chemistry-climate models during a geomagnetically active period in April 2010. Results are evaluated by comparison with observations of nitric oxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Differences between the ionization rate data-sets have been assessed in a companion study. In the lower thermosphere, NO densities differ by up to one order of magnitude between models using the same ionization rate data-sets due to differences in the treatment of NO formation, model climatology, and model top height. However, a good agreement in the spatial and temporal variability of NO with observations lends confidence that the electron ionization is represented well above 80 km. In the mesosphere, the averages of model results from all chemistry-climate models differ consistently with the differences in the ionization-rate data-sets, but are within the spread of the observations, so no clear assessment on their comparative validity can be provided. However, observed enhanced amounts of NO in the mid-mesosphere below 70 km suggest a relevant contribution of the high-energy tail of the electron distribution to the hemispheric NO budget during and after the geomagnetic storm on April 6.",
keywords = "energetic electron precipitation, mesosphere, lower thermosphere, geomagnetic forcing, energetic particle precipitation, middle atmosphere, ENERGETIC PARTICLE-PRECIPITATION, CHEMISTRY-CLIMATE MODEL, ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, LOWER THERMOSPHERE, SOLAR-CYCLE, MESOSPHERE, SCIAMACHY, PARAMETERIZATION, FLUXES, MIPAS",
author = "M. Sinnhuber and {Nesse Tyssoy}, H. and T. Asikainen and S. Bender and B. Funke and K. Hendrickx and Pettit, {J. M.} and T. Reddmann and E. Rozanov and H. Schmidt and C. Smith-Johnsen and T. Sukhodolov and Szelag, {M. E.} and {van de Kamp}, M. and Verronen, {P. T.} and Wissing, {J. M.} and Yakovchuk, {O. S.}",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1029/2021JA029466",
language = "Английский",
volume = "127",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
issn = "2169-9380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heppa III Intercomparison Experiment on Electron Precipitation Impacts

T2 - 2. Model-Measurement Intercomparison of Nitric Oxide (NO) During a Geomagnetic Storm in April 2010

AU - Sinnhuber, M.

AU - Nesse Tyssoy, H.

AU - Asikainen, T.

AU - Bender, S.

AU - Funke, B.

AU - Hendrickx, K.

AU - Pettit, J. M.

AU - Reddmann, T.

AU - Rozanov, E.

AU - Schmidt, H.

AU - Smith-Johnsen, C.

AU - Sukhodolov, T.

AU - Szelag, M. E.

AU - van de Kamp, M.

AU - Verronen, P. T.

AU - Wissing, J. M.

AU - Yakovchuk, O. S.

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered to play an important part in the natural forcing of the middle atmosphere with a possible impact on the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistry-climate models. The HEPPA III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. In this study, we apply electron ionization rates from three data-sets in four chemistry-climate models during a geomagnetically active period in April 2010. Results are evaluated by comparison with observations of nitric oxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Differences between the ionization rate data-sets have been assessed in a companion study. In the lower thermosphere, NO densities differ by up to one order of magnitude between models using the same ionization rate data-sets due to differences in the treatment of NO formation, model climatology, and model top height. However, a good agreement in the spatial and temporal variability of NO with observations lends confidence that the electron ionization is represented well above 80 km. In the mesosphere, the averages of model results from all chemistry-climate models differ consistently with the differences in the ionization-rate data-sets, but are within the spread of the observations, so no clear assessment on their comparative validity can be provided. However, observed enhanced amounts of NO in the mid-mesosphere below 70 km suggest a relevant contribution of the high-energy tail of the electron distribution to the hemispheric NO budget during and after the geomagnetic storm on April 6.

AB - Precipitating auroral and radiation belt electrons are considered to play an important part in the natural forcing of the middle atmosphere with a possible impact on the climate system. Recent studies suggest that this forcing is underestimated in current chemistry-climate models. The HEPPA III intercomparison experiment is a collective effort to address this point. In this study, we apply electron ionization rates from three data-sets in four chemistry-climate models during a geomagnetically active period in April 2010. Results are evaluated by comparison with observations of nitric oxide (NO) in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Differences between the ionization rate data-sets have been assessed in a companion study. In the lower thermosphere, NO densities differ by up to one order of magnitude between models using the same ionization rate data-sets due to differences in the treatment of NO formation, model climatology, and model top height. However, a good agreement in the spatial and temporal variability of NO with observations lends confidence that the electron ionization is represented well above 80 km. In the mesosphere, the averages of model results from all chemistry-climate models differ consistently with the differences in the ionization-rate data-sets, but are within the spread of the observations, so no clear assessment on their comparative validity can be provided. However, observed enhanced amounts of NO in the mid-mesosphere below 70 km suggest a relevant contribution of the high-energy tail of the electron distribution to the hemispheric NO budget during and after the geomagnetic storm on April 6.

KW - energetic electron precipitation

KW - mesosphere

KW - lower thermosphere

KW - geomagnetic forcing

KW - energetic particle precipitation

KW - middle atmosphere

KW - ENERGETIC PARTICLE-PRECIPITATION

KW - CHEMISTRY-CLIMATE MODEL

KW - ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY

KW - LOWER THERMOSPHERE

KW - SOLAR-CYCLE

KW - MESOSPHERE

KW - SCIAMACHY

KW - PARAMETERIZATION

KW - FLUXES

KW - MIPAS

U2 - 10.1029/2021JA029466

DO - 10.1029/2021JA029466

M3 - статья

VL - 127

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

SN - 2169-9380

IS - 1

M1 - e2021JA029466

ER -

ID: 105534653