Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received)

Standard

Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received). / Razeev, D. N. .

In: Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2019, p. 644-649.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{d5e56b458ed7441281eb69dff56ee0a8,

title = "Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received)",

abstract = "This paper provides comments on the objections received from colleagues to my paper “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research.” The author clarifies some aspects of his article and emphasizes his previous thesis: data from contemporary neuroscience do not evidence our lack of free will, though they do not confirm that it exists. From the author{\textquoteright}s point of view, adequate investigation of the phenomenon of free will requires creation of a new experimental paradigm by scientists of different specialties.",

keywords = "A. M. Ivanitsky, D. I. Dubrovsky, V. A. Klucharev, V. M. Allakhverdov, V. V. Vasilyev, free will, freedom of action",

author = "Razeev, {D. N.}",

note = "Razeev, D.N. Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received). Neurosci Behav Physi 49, 644–649 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00783-3",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/s11055-019-00783-3",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "644--649",

journal = "Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology",

issn = "0097-0549",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received)

AU - Razeev, D. N.

N1 - Razeev, D.N. Guarded Optimism in Questions of Free Will (comments on objections received). Neurosci Behav Physi 49, 644–649 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00783-3

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper provides comments on the objections received from colleagues to my paper “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research.” The author clarifies some aspects of his article and emphasizes his previous thesis: data from contemporary neuroscience do not evidence our lack of free will, though they do not confirm that it exists. From the author’s point of view, adequate investigation of the phenomenon of free will requires creation of a new experimental paradigm by scientists of different specialties.

AB - This paper provides comments on the objections received from colleagues to my paper “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research.” The author clarifies some aspects of his article and emphasizes his previous thesis: data from contemporary neuroscience do not evidence our lack of free will, though they do not confirm that it exists. From the author’s point of view, adequate investigation of the phenomenon of free will requires creation of a new experimental paradigm by scientists of different specialties.

KW - A. M. Ivanitsky

KW - D. I. Dubrovsky

KW - V. A. Klucharev

KW - V. M. Allakhverdov

KW - V. V. Vasilyev

KW - free will

KW - freedom of action

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067458974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11055-019-00783-3

DO - 10.1007/s11055-019-00783-3

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 644

EP - 649

JO - Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

JF - Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

SN - 0097-0549

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 43089656