GRAMMATICAL LACUNARITY MANIFESTATION IN MODALITY CATEGORY ASPECT

Standard

GRAMMATICAL LACUNARITY MANIFESTATION IN MODALITY CATEGORY ASPECT. / Akay, Oksana M. .

In: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, Vol. 115, 01.09.2021, p. 459-465.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article

Author

Akay, Oksana M. . / GRAMMATICAL LACUNARITY MANIFESTATION IN MODALITY CATEGORY ASPECT. In: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. 2021 ; Vol. 115. pp. 459-465.

BibTeX

@article{c5c414aba76a429795bec71685c49034,

title = "GRAMMATICAL LACUNARITY MANIFESTATION IN MODALITY CATEGORY ASPECT",

abstract = "The ideas of grammatical lacunarity were implicitly contained in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis of linguisticrelativity more than 100 years ago. According to the strong version of this hypothesis, language,understood as a set of multilevel units, radically affects human consciousness and world perception. Moreoften, however, the fact that the consciousness of an individual is formed and developed under theinfluence of extralinguistic and linguistic factors proper is also taken into account, therefore, the decisiverole of language in this process is not discussed. Although the study of the language influence onconsciousness and thinking is a subject of research in philosophy, biology, psychology, linguistics, aswell as in cultural studies, however, over more than a century history of this comprehensive hypothesisexistence the answers to the questions about what most of all affects human consciousness formation,why the representatives of different nations and cultures percept the surrounding reality in different ways,have not been given. The linguistic approach to substantiating the determinism of language and thinkingis based on the study of language as a system. The term “system” (Greek systema - consisting of parts)dates back to the time of Aristotle, when ancient philosophers started using it in the meaning of “many,union”. The systematic approach makes it possible to single out the universal and particular features inthe system of a particular language.",

keywords = "Grammatical categories, interlingual lacuna, intralingual lacuna, lacunarity, modality, modus",

author = "Akay, {Oksana M.}",

note = "Brusenskaya, L. А., & Kulikova, E. G. (2018). Medialinguistics: origins, problems and prospects. Media Education, 1, 168-183. Brusenskaya, L. A., Arsenieva, V. A., & Suryanto, T. (2018). Verbal Crime: the Problem of Insult in the Media Text. Media Education, 3, 12–24. Cavaliere, F. (2018). Discursive Mechanisms of News Media – Investigating Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 338-356. Dymarsky, M. Ya. (2009). Vozmozhna li ontologicheskaya interpretaziya ponyatiya lakuni? [Is an ontological interpretation of the concept of a lacuna possible? Lacunarity in language, picture of the world, dictionary and text: interuniversity collection of scientific works]. Publishing house of NSPU: 189-195. [in Rus.] Epshtejn, M. N. (2016). Ot znaniya – k tvorchestvu. Kak gumanitarnye nauki mogut izmenyat' mir [From knowledge to creativity. How Humanities can change the world]. Center for humanitarian initiatives. [in Rus.]. Gambier, Yv. (2019). Impact of technology on Translation and Translation Studies. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 23(2), pp. 344-361. Guinda, C. S. (2018). The Emotional Prosody of U.S. Fatal Air-Accident Dockets Online: Risking Risk Communication? Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 126-143. Khazagerov, G. G. (2018). Rhetoric, Grammar, Discourse, Homeostasis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(2): 357-372. Krongauz, M. A. (2008). Russkij yazyk na grani nervnogo sryva [The Russian language on the nervous breakdown verge]. Languages of Slavic cultures. [in Rus.]. & Larina, T. V. (2019). Introduction to Politeness and Impoliteness Research in Global Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(4), 873-903. Makarov, M. L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [Discourse Theory Foundations]. «Gnozis», 2003. Markovina, I. Yu., & Sorokin, Yu. A. (2010). Kul{\textquoteright}tura i text. Vvedeniye v lakunologiyu [Culture and text. Introduction to lacunology]. GEOTAR-Media. [in Rus.]. Sdobnikov, V. V. (2019). Translation Studies Today: Old Problems and New Challenges. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 295-327. Locher, M. A., Contexts. Shaklein, V. M., EpSBS. & Mamontov, A. S. (2019). Russian as a foreign language teachers{\textquoteright} professional culture in the globalized world. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 420-430. Shalifova, O. N., & Savickaya, E. V. (2015). K voprosu o sushchnosti yazykovyh lakun [To the question about the essence of language gaps]. Proceedings of the Samara scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 17(1), pp. 178-183. [in Rus.]. Zhao, M. (2016). A game-theoretic analysis on the use of indirect speech acts. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1811, 103-115.; The Russian Language in Modern Scientific and Educational Environment ; Conference date: 28-10-2020 Through 29-10-2020",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.50",

language = "English",

volume = "115",

pages = "459--465",

journal = "The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences",

issn = "2357-1330",

publisher = "Future Academy",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - GRAMMATICAL LACUNARITY MANIFESTATION IN MODALITY CATEGORY ASPECT

AU - Akay, Oksana M.

N1 - Brusenskaya, L. А., & Kulikova, E. G. (2018). Medialinguistics: origins, problems and prospects. Media Education, 1, 168-183. Brusenskaya, L. A., Arsenieva, V. A., & Suryanto, T. (2018). Verbal Crime: the Problem of Insult in the Media Text. Media Education, 3, 12–24. Cavaliere, F. (2018). Discursive Mechanisms of News Media – Investigating Attribution and Attitudinal Positioning. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 338-356. Dymarsky, M. Ya. (2009). Vozmozhna li ontologicheskaya interpretaziya ponyatiya lakuni? [Is an ontological interpretation of the concept of a lacuna possible? Lacunarity in language, picture of the world, dictionary and text: interuniversity collection of scientific works]. Publishing house of NSPU: 189-195. [in Rus.] Epshtejn, M. N. (2016). Ot znaniya – k tvorchestvu. Kak gumanitarnye nauki mogut izmenyat' mir [From knowledge to creativity. How Humanities can change the world]. Center for humanitarian initiatives. [in Rus.]. Gambier, Yv. (2019). Impact of technology on Translation and Translation Studies. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 23(2), pp. 344-361. Guinda, C. S. (2018). The Emotional Prosody of U.S. Fatal Air-Accident Dockets Online: Risking Risk Communication? Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 126-143. Khazagerov, G. G. (2018). Rhetoric, Grammar, Discourse, Homeostasis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(2): 357-372. Krongauz, M. A. (2008). Russkij yazyk na grani nervnogo sryva [The Russian language on the nervous breakdown verge]. Languages of Slavic cultures. [in Rus.]. & Larina, T. V. (2019). Introduction to Politeness and Impoliteness Research in Global Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(4), 873-903. Makarov, M. L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa [Discourse Theory Foundations]. «Gnozis», 2003. Markovina, I. Yu., & Sorokin, Yu. A. (2010). Kul’tura i text. Vvedeniye v lakunologiyu [Culture and text. Introduction to lacunology]. GEOTAR-Media. [in Rus.]. Sdobnikov, V. V. (2019). Translation Studies Today: Old Problems and New Challenges. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 295-327. Locher, M. A., Contexts. Shaklein, V. M., EpSBS. & Mamontov, A. S. (2019). Russian as a foreign language teachers’ professional culture in the globalized world. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. 420-430. Shalifova, O. N., & Savickaya, E. V. (2015). K voprosu o sushchnosti yazykovyh lakun [To the question about the essence of language gaps]. Proceedings of the Samara scientific center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 17(1), pp. 178-183. [in Rus.]. Zhao, M. (2016). A game-theoretic analysis on the use of indirect speech acts. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1811, 103-115.

PY - 2021/9/1

Y1 - 2021/9/1

N2 - The ideas of grammatical lacunarity were implicitly contained in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis of linguisticrelativity more than 100 years ago. According to the strong version of this hypothesis, language,understood as a set of multilevel units, radically affects human consciousness and world perception. Moreoften, however, the fact that the consciousness of an individual is formed and developed under theinfluence of extralinguistic and linguistic factors proper is also taken into account, therefore, the decisiverole of language in this process is not discussed. Although the study of the language influence onconsciousness and thinking is a subject of research in philosophy, biology, psychology, linguistics, aswell as in cultural studies, however, over more than a century history of this comprehensive hypothesisexistence the answers to the questions about what most of all affects human consciousness formation,why the representatives of different nations and cultures percept the surrounding reality in different ways,have not been given. The linguistic approach to substantiating the determinism of language and thinkingis based on the study of language as a system. The term “system” (Greek systema - consisting of parts)dates back to the time of Aristotle, when ancient philosophers started using it in the meaning of “many,union”. The systematic approach makes it possible to single out the universal and particular features inthe system of a particular language.

AB - The ideas of grammatical lacunarity were implicitly contained in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis of linguisticrelativity more than 100 years ago. According to the strong version of this hypothesis, language,understood as a set of multilevel units, radically affects human consciousness and world perception. Moreoften, however, the fact that the consciousness of an individual is formed and developed under theinfluence of extralinguistic and linguistic factors proper is also taken into account, therefore, the decisiverole of language in this process is not discussed. Although the study of the language influence onconsciousness and thinking is a subject of research in philosophy, biology, psychology, linguistics, aswell as in cultural studies, however, over more than a century history of this comprehensive hypothesisexistence the answers to the questions about what most of all affects human consciousness formation,why the representatives of different nations and cultures percept the surrounding reality in different ways,have not been given. The linguistic approach to substantiating the determinism of language and thinkingis based on the study of language as a system. The term “system” (Greek systema - consisting of parts)dates back to the time of Aristotle, when ancient philosophers started using it in the meaning of “many,union”. The systematic approach makes it possible to single out the universal and particular features inthe system of a particular language.

KW - Grammatical categories, interlingual lacuna, intralingual lacuna, lacunarity, modality, modus

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0fe570d9-cec3-3330-b33c-70ef90dff9c8/

U2 - 10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.50

DO - 10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.50

M3 - Conference article

VL - 115

SP - 459

EP - 465

JO - The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences

JF - The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences

SN - 2357-1330

T2 - The Russian Language in Modern Scientific and Educational Environment

Y2 - 28 October 2020 through 29 October 2020

ER -

ID: 87458905